VMworld

This Question is Possibly Answered

1 "correct" answer available (4 pts) 2 "helpful" answers available (2 pts)
2 Replies Last post: Nov 10, 2008 10:32 AM by ofir  
Click to view sahil_rihan's profile Candidate 3 posts since
Aug 6, 2008

Nov 8, 2008 5:34 PM

How does the HDS implementation of VMware SRM differ from other storage vendors?

And how does USP-V work with other storage vendor solutions in one integrated environment?
Click to view Christophe Bertrand's profile Candidate 2 posts since
Nov 6, 2008
1. Nov 10, 2008 8:26 AM in response to: sahil_rihan
Re: How does the HDS implementation of VMware SRM differ from other storage vendors?

Sahil,

The answer to your first question, is that the Hitachi Data Systems SRM solution gives customers a choice of synchronous or asynchronous remote replication between sites; so whatever your business requirements for data consistency, the Hitachi solution will work. Secondly, our implementation utilized a full-volume clone at the remote site (ShadowImage software), which allows random D/R testing without distrupting ongoing remote replication.

The answer to your second question is that the USP-V allows customers to 'virtualize' other storage vendors solutions 'behind' the Hitachi USP-V. Therefore you may continue to utilize existing storage capacity, perhaps in a tiered structure, all logically presented to host applications under the USP-V umbrella.

Click to view ofir's profile Candidate 1 posts since
Aug 24, 2008
2. Nov 10, 2008 10:32 AM in response to: Christophe Bertrand
Re: How does the HDS implementation of VMware SRM differ from other storage vendors?
but the same goes for EMC , they support mirroview Sync/Async and SRDF Sync/Async for SRM..