I wouldnt say it was a joke. More coffee would have been nice, more repeating sessions would have helped but the idea of registering for a session in advance worked pretty well for me.
Actually, I thought they did a pretty good job. The only complaint I heard was people unable to get into labs.
No those are NOT my conditions of attendance. I liked the content, when I could get into them, and it is very important to me. VMWare did a good job of communicating what is going to be in the sessions out to the people. OMO I think they need to communicate other things a little better as well like the things I mentioned. As far as scheduling and planning and all that, yea I did, but I am very busy with my job during the week and like to get out on the weekends so I kind of did the schedule thing real quick and then revisited it later in August. So you are saying you never like to get out and party? Unlike you, it seems, I like to get out from behind this screen and do things outside and with friends. Everyone has their own opinion on this matter, I am simply saying that the venue was to small for the amount of people. At TechEd/Connections I didn't have to do any of this two/three month ahead planning, I did it the night before because I was guranteed to get into any session no matter what. This is NOT how VMWare does it and I am saying they should in the future.
For me it was ok as well. (maybe better then the past years)
The only thing what was annoying was that they had the scanners inside the rooms so the presentation was always disturbed by them.
WiFi service was disappointing. I managed to connect to the WiFi once and only for 10 minutes. We had an problem in the office back home and I was not able to log in to help them. At TechEd and Altiris the WiFi was restricted to a few lounge areas and the service was better.
I have to say that I agree with you. The communications at this conference were horrendous. I have an AT&T 3G phone and while at the conference it showed full connectivity and bars however most days once the level of geekdom reached it's peek I could no longer make calls or even txt within the building. Wireless was a complete failure unless you got in early or stayed late and sat in one place all day where you might happen to have gotten a DHCP address. Just walking around the venue there was no way you'd stay connected to it. Was anybody else annoyed at the wireless help desk booth people telling you to make sure you "rebooted already"? The break-out sessions left a lot to be desired. To many people, hard to hear, hard to see and constantly letting people in 10, 15, 30 minutes after it started while the scanners were located inside the rooms which caused my attention to constantly be diverted. Some of the break outs really looked promising as far as learning something in my opinion only to be let down by the content presented think of the where's the beef commercials. As for the labs I'd rather pay a fee and have my own station than get into only 2 registered labs for free and have to share a station with someone. The content of the labs was good even though one of them the VMware staff nor I could ever get to work at my station. The food was pretty tasty I must say and it's availablity was on par with the other conventions I've been to. All in all I'd say it was an O.K. experience however I'll be suggesting
that we not send anybody else to VMworld unless they make some serious
changes.
This was my 3rd year and while I do agree there are things that could be done better, I have to say that:
A) The geographic location and the distance between sessions is way better than LA was in '06
B) The "crowd" was better managed and felt not as bad as SF in '07.
The biggest complaint I have this year was the escalators...they should have been more on top of which direction those things were going. Remember also, this is still a fairly new conference. This is only the 5th year and this year, they did two.
Dress accordingly? Apparently you didn't get the memo that this is
a tech industry conference, not an accountant's convention. You're in the
wrong industry to be a suit.
Nobody asks you to wear a suit, just not shorts and flip-flops.
I personally don't find professional to dress for a beach when I go to work.
Also I find disturbing to be forced to a close observation of somebody's hairy legs and dirty bare feet, and I guess I'm not alone.
My first VMWorld and I have to agree about the BOF sessions, they were an absolute waste of time. If I had known how they would be executed I would of never scheduled any.
San Francisco was bad last year, but VMworld Europe was much, much worse.
The coaches from the airport dropped us at the event, where we were handed a map to our hotels, and sent off into the night wheeling our suitcases behind us.
And the next day, when the event kicked off, things didn't get any better.
I waited in line for 15 minutes to get to the toilets, and when I eventually got in there, well let's just say it was not a pleasant sight or smell that greeted me.
The party was even more crowded. There was a queue for everything. I waited in line for 15 minutes to get in, then was herded towards a tent, where I then waited 10 minutes to get a beer. I walked around to find something to eat, but the best I could find was a barbeque thing outside. So I waited in line for 20 minutes there to get a piece of chicken about the size of my thumb...And when I took a bite out of it, it was raw in the middle. So after 1 hour with 1 beer, no food and now sore feet from all the walking & queuing, I gave up and went back to my hotel.
I COMPLETELY disagree. It is obvious you haven't been to any previous vmworld conferences because you would know this was a HUGE improvement from last year (San Fran). Last year's conference center was way too small which did not allow them to serve snacks between sessions or even hot lunches. Everyone had a boxed lunch and ate outside while sitting on the grass. No thanks! ..not to mention there were rumors of the fire department stopping by to assess the situation with the number of people packed into the building.
I hear, they are moving the conference back to San Fran next year - what a shame. I love the city - but the venue cannot accommodate the loads of people. Las Vegas definitely has the facilities for such events not to mention there was never a dull moment between sessions or events.
Back in 2000, JaveOne at Moscone hosted 25K people, so if they can predict attendance, we can reasonably expect the facility to support it.
KC
I don't see how they were able to sustain 25k people. I thought the center was much smaller then Vegas and like I said, I'm not happy with cold boxed lunches when I'm paying $1700+ to attend the conference.
They did not use all of the Moscone Center last year. They will obviously have to use the whole thing next year.
Gotta disagree with you. I went to VMworld 2007 in San Francisco and it was worse. This time, The Venetian handled the capacity quite well and it didn't take that long to get from one session to the next. I thought the rooms and labs were appropriately sized, too (compared to last year).
Food was much better, too. Warm meals are always a welcome compared to last years cold breakfast and lunch. I wished they expanded the labs- more labs and the ability to pick 3 labs total.
Actions
More Like This
- Retrieving data ...








