the best people (at this conference) to answer this question are probably the guys at the NetApp booth. check them out! we use NFS almost exclusively, for both rootfs and also Oracle, and we're super happy with the results!
Hi ,
well that was a good suggesstion, could you please help me out with links to Netapp were in i can get some good documents for the best practice on the NFS storage, sizing and configuration
Hi Pramod,
Check this link out -> http://www.netapp.com/us/library/
Set the search criteria to "Technical Reports" and simply search for "VMware". There is a best practice guide for VI3 on NetApp that talks about NFS and its benefits. Works like a charm and I have many, many, many customers using it in production environments.
Here is the link to the NetApp VMware best practices doc
http://www.netapp.com/us/library/technical-reports/tr-3428.html
Limitations:
Delayed support in newer products - SRM is not supporting NFS - VDI Offline or View Offline is not expected to support NFS in the first release.
Benefits:
Lack of LUN thrashing challenge - not having to deal with evaluating the amount of VM's on a LUN and their IO load.
Not having to deal with SCSI locking challenges of creating/deleting/snapshotting VM's - read VMware storage scalability - http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/scalable_storage_performance.pdf
Flexibility in growing volumes easily (not having to extent)
Replication advantages - not having to deal with LUN resignaturing if you are not leveraging SRM
With NetApp - deduplication is a little easier to leverage the benefits on NFS - you see the space savings in ESX - on block storage the savings is presented to the NetApp system and must be presented back to the ESX host as another LUN.
just some quick thoughts - I am getting on a plane.
-don
Hi don
Thank you so much , that was really helpfull
Actions
More Like This
- Retrieving data ...








