This Question is Possibly Answered
1 "correct" answer available (5 pts) 2 forum.thrd.helpful_answer.plural.text available (4 pts)
Okay, as I asked the question I will go first.
Ditch the Windows Task Schedular and integrate schedules.
Personally, I'd like to see a better on-line support forum and knowledgebase.
Jason
faster restore times. it takes me hours to restore a single file from a 300gb file server.
I second the need for an integrated scheduler. It would also be nice if this scheduler showed you previous jobs, and their success/failure rate.
Vranger also really needs a way to make groups of vms to backup. Dont make me put the vms in folders in virtual center, let me just pick and choose which ones I want for each job.
Ditch the Windows Task Scheduler and integrate schedules. Yes, 4.0 has its own service
I'd like to see a better on-line support forum and knowledgebase.
support forum and knowledgebase
[
http://www.vizioncore.com/Knowledgebase.html|http://supportforums.vizioncore.com/forums/default.aspxhttp://www.vizioncore.com/Knowledgebase.html]
Faster restore times. it takes me hours to restore a single file from a 300gb file server.
Yes file level restore will no longer take this long.
vRanger also really needs a way to make groups of VM's to backup. Don't make me put the VM's in folders in virtual center, let me just pick and choose which ones I want for each job.
You will see this also..
More confident test messages during install rather than the classic message after testing the connection to Virtual Center Server of: "Those settings appear to work." Every time I work with customers to install vRanger we get a really good laugh at Vizioncore's expense.
I would like to see vRanger become a complete solution for disk-based backup for customers with block level de-dupe that allows customers to leverage any ole file server with redundant drives for their backup target.
Also, support Linux destinations for backup like you do Windows file shares. Not everyone is a Windows shop and being able to through your favorite distro on a box with lot of disks would help you sell more vRanger to folks tired of managing their Perl hack-age.
And personally, I would like Vizioncore to offer a limited edition, boxed version of vRanger signed by George Pradel himself. Is that too much to ask? ![]()
Backup to tape would be nice so I don't have to use another product.
Single Pass File Restore with Catalog Feature
GIve the ability to view all files backed-up in the VMDK and the ability to select any/all files for restore before the restore process begins. Then only restore the selected files like the file add-on does today only in a tightly integrated setup.
This is mostly there today IMO
Integrated Scheduler - this was mentioned above as possibly in v4...
More scheduing options - give the ability to setup exactly what days the fulls vs. diffs run. Today you rely on the number of days after the full, not the exact day of the week.
Better method than retendays. This is way too confusing - there should be an easy way to setup the software to retain the backups for x days, not some wierd setting for retention that is actually double the number you input.
Better logging and reporting.
Option for log cleaning automatically after so long. Today we are manually cleaning the log directories
"Dashboard" option to quickly see the pass/fail status on all backup jobs and easily select a day to see the status of the jobs for that day
Speed/Speed/Speed - restores are massively slow with the file plugin. Need some serious speed improvements here when you are wanting the file level restoration. Full VMDK is not too bad...
That is my wishlist,
I wish I was at the show this year....:(
Andy Bradley
Windows Platform Manager
Rea Magnet Wire
Single Pass File Restore with Catalog Feature - Catalog Feature Not in 4.0 but maybe in 4.x
GIve the ability to view all files backed-up in the VMDK and the ability to select any/all files for restore before the restore process begins. Then only restore the selected files like the file add-on does today only in a tightly integrated setup.You will see this
This is mostly there today IMO
Integrated Scheduler - this was mentioned above as possibly in v4... You will see thisMore scheduing options - give the ability to setup exactly what days the fulls vs. diffs run. Today you rely on the number of days after the full, not the exact day of the week. You will see thisBetter method than retendays. This is way too confusing - there should be an easy way to setup the software to retain the backups for x days, not some wierd setting for retention that is actually double the number you input. You will see thisBetter logging and reporting. You will see this
Option for log cleaning automatically after so long. Today we are manually cleaning the log directories
"Dashboard" option to quickly see the pass/fail status on all backup jobs and easily select a day to see the status of the jobs for that day You will see this
Speed/Speed/Speed - restores are massively slow with the file plugin. Need some serious speed improvements here when you are wanting the file level restoration. Full VMDK is not too bad... You will see this
Better mounting of the file system when trying to do it on the proxy. Had it for 2 years now and still cant mount a drive.
I forgot an important one in my reply above -
Native support for ESXi without any other options necessary like Consolidated backup or VirtualCenter.
This would allow us to run backups/restores at our remote locations and our test environment.
Andy Bradley
Windows Platform Manager
Rea Magnet Wire
I would like to see two things in the new version:
1- Delegation
2- Integration in the VI Client
1. Goodbye to the Microsoft Access database which needs to be pruned and compacted on a regular basis. This is NOT a scalable enterprise database solution.
2. Faster support for new VI releases from VMware.
Jason Boche
Yes, you can say good bye to the access DB and say hello to built in SQL express or external SQL server support.
Actions
More Like This
- Retrieving data ...
