http://www.vmworld.com/blogs/wfs1776 Comment Feed for Bill Stebelski's Blog 2009-04-25T14:18:31Z http://www.vmworld.com/blogs/wfs1776/2009/04/09/the-first-vmark-results-for-nehalem-are-posted#comment-1750 <!-- [DocumentBodyStart:5ae847e5-62b1-4494-b689-acec0ceb23ba] --><div class='jive-rendered-content'><p>Bill,</p><p>We're in the final phases of testing Nehalem (aka Xeon 5500) on the vConsolidate benchmark with ESX4. Results are going through those final ugly legal reviews by all the companies involved. I think you'll be pleased by the increase in numbers of VMs from Harpertown (Xeon 5400) to Nehalem. I'll post the results here when they're approved.</p><p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;">&nbsp;</p><p> -- Jim Blakley (Intel)</p></div><!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:5ae847e5-62b1-4494-b689-acec0ceb23ba] --> 2009-04-25T14:18:31Z http://www.vmworld.com/blogs/wfs1776/2009/04/09/the-first-vmark-results-for-nehalem-are-posted#comment-1735 <!-- [DocumentBodyStart:996fa102-bdff-4880-ae27-a89fe2a102d6] --><div class='jive-rendered-content'><p>There is a lively discussion going on on the the VMTN site that is drilling into this subject and providing substantial additional comments and information on relative Nehalem performance:</p><p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;">&nbsp;</p><p><a class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.vmware.com//thread/202280?tstart=15">http://communities.vmware.com//thread/202280?tstart=15</a></p></div><!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:996fa102-bdff-4880-ae27-a89fe2a102d6] --> 2009-04-16T00:06:20Z