VMworld

 

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

The next BriefingsDirect case study discussion targets how biotechnology services provider Acorda Therapeutics has implemented a strategic disaster recovery (DR) capability to protect its highly virtualized IT operations and data.

See  how Acorda Therapeutics’ use of advanced backup and DR best   practices  and products has helped it to manage rapid growth, cut energy   costs,  and gain the means to recover and manage applications and data   faster.  Also learn how these advanced DR benefits have led to   other data center flexibly and even migration benefits.

Sharing more detail on how modernizing DR has helped improve many aspects of Acorda Therapeutics’ responsiveness is Josh Bauer, Senior Manager of Network Operations at Acorda Therapeutics  in Hawthorne, NY. The discussion was moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:

Gardner: What do you perceive as being  different today about DR than  just a few years ago? Is this really a  fast-moving area?

 

Bauer: One of the most prominent changes is recovery time.   You no longer need to restore from physical tape and see recovery  times  of upwards of 24 hours, something that we hadn’t seen until  recently.  We implemented Site Recovery Manager (SRM) from VMware and we can now do that same recovery in about four hours.

 

We're  constantly replicating   using RecoverPoint and we can get data up to  the minute, versus tape,   where you are at the whim of whether the  backup completed on time -- did   everything go to tape, and when was it  done? It could have been two   days ago, versus now, when it's data  that’s 100 percent synced up to a   minute ago.

 

When we had about 80 employees, we probably barely had a terabyte, and now with 350 employees we easily have over 14 terabytes.

 

Gardner: I am also wondering, because you are   in the healthcare and  biotechnology field, are there aspects of the new DR   that appeal to  you from a compliance or regulatory perspective as well?

 

Bauer: Definitely. Four times per year we have to prove that we can recover    all of our software and data by doing a DR test. Until we had SRM, we    had to do it all from tape, from a cold facility, and it would take us  a   day, sometimes a day-and-a-half. That’s just not the best way to do    things. But now, with SRM, we can always do these tests on the fly,  even   from our office, from home, or from wherever.

Gardner: Tell me a little bit more about Acorda Therapeutics.    You were founded in 1995. Tell us what you do, so our audience can    understand the type of company you are and type of products and services    you provide.

Recent growth


Bauer: We create treatments for people with multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, or other neurological disorders. We have two marketed drugs in the market right now, the most recent of which, Ampyra,    helps people with multiple sclerosis walk better, and it has been a    huge success. And that's the main reason we've been growing so much    lately.

 

Prior to virtualization, we were spending a   lot of time managing our infrastructure, with all those physical servers.    Once we virtualized everything, we spent way less time managing the    infrastructure and could spend more time helping the business.

 

In    fact, the IT department itself has become less like a computer repair    shop and more like a strategy center. I'm constantly being brought  into   projects to help the business make the right decisions when it  comes  to  any type of technology.

 

The next logical step would be  to  have my  team spend less time doing these four-times-a-year DR  drills  the way I  described before. With SRM it’s a few clicks. We're  saving so  much time  and we are able to do other things.

 

Gardner: Tell me how you got to the point today, where you can deal   with  something like 14 terabytes and moment-by-moment backup  capability?

Strategic partner


Bauer: It all really started at VMworld.    That’s been a fantastic way for me to learn what's out there, what's    coming up, and just staying in the know. That’s actually where I met International Computerware, Inc. (ICI), who is one of our strategic partners for storage and virtualization.

 

I    had approached them with the growth issue. We had already started   doing  virtualization on our own. I had used it at a previous company,   but I  wasn’t familiar with SRM, and it looked like it might be a nice   fit for  improving our DR. So ICI came in and they sort of held our   hands and  helped us with that project.

 

Specific to storage, they   have also  helped us make sure that we do better management of growth,   anticipate  our growth, and show that we have more than what we're  going  to need,  before the growth happens, and they've done some  analysis on  like what  we have. We brought them in before things got  too bad.

 

Since using VMware, we've noticed uptime  upwards  of three nines  monthly. Before that, when we were mostly a  physical  environment, it was  nowhere near that much. We had physical  servers  going down all the  time.

 

VMware immediately gained our  trust,  seeing that they came  out with this product for DR. It was a  name that  we trusted. Then, we  played with it for a while, and it  worked out  fantastically.

 

It's  all about trusting VMware and  then, again,  ICI, working with them. They  just know their stuff. We  have a lot of  different partners we work  with, but we prefer to use  ICI, because  they really focus on doing  things properly. It's more  about working  with someone that really knows  what they are doing. They  understand  that we have some skills, as well.  They're not trying to  sell us  something we don’t need.

 

95 percent virtualized

 

We  are 95 percent virtualized here. The only thing that’s not virtual   is  our fax server, which requires a physical fax board and that’s about    it. Everything else is virtual.

 

Gardner: So this is across all tiered apps, tier one, three, four?

 

Bauer: That’s correct, our SQL apps, our Exchange, everything you can think of is virtualized.

 

Gardner: I understand you're using vSphere 5. You're on vCenter SRM 5. That only came out towards the end of last year. So you just jumped right on that.

 

Bauer: Oh, I didn’t waste any time. We were very excited about it, especially this new option of using a failback, which wasn’t really part of SRM Version 4.

 

If  you ever have the very unlikely event of a a disaster, when you do a    recovery, you're now operating off of the disaster equipment or    recovery equipment. While that’s happening, people are still saving    files and generating new data. If you were to just simply turn on the    original equipment again, all that data would be lost. So you need to    fail back to re-sync everything.

 

With SRM Version 4, you had to    configure two one-way recovery systems. So it would take a lot more    time. But now with failback, it's a lot more smooth, kind of built-in.

 

Gardner: Do you actually have separate data centers that you are backing up to? What's the topology or architecture that you're using?

 

Bauer: We have two separate data centers, recovery and production. At the  moment they're only a few towns apart, but we are shopping   around for a  data center much further away. We hope to do that in the   next six  months or so.

Gardner: Looking to the future, one other area I wanted to hit on, which is    important to a lot of folks, especially in some overseas markets, is    this issue about energy. Did you have any impact on energy and/or    storage costs associated with the total life cycle of the data?

 

Bauer: We reduced the footprint by easily 75 percent by not needing so many    physical servers. That’s a pretty huge shout-out to VMware there.  Also,   we're not using that much power. We don’t need as big a data  center.  Not  as much cooling is needed. There's a whole assortment of  things,  when  you take out all the physical servers.

 

Gardner: Now,   looking to the future, other areas that people have described as  a  segue  from going to high virtualization, exploiting the latest   technologies  in DR, is to start thinking about desktop virtualization infrastructure (VDI) and desktop-as-a-service. They're even looking at cloud and hybrid-cloud models for hosting apps, then backing them up and recovering them in    different data centers, which you've alluded to. Do you have any    thoughts about where this could possibly lead?

 

Bauer: In   fact, if you were going to ask me what my next initiative was  going to   be, and you didn’t mention desktops, that’s the first thing  that would   have come to mind. We're starting to explore replacing our  laptops with   virtual desktops. I'm hoping this is something that we  could implement   next year.

Right way to go

 

This seems like the right way to go, because our helpdesk team spends too much time swapping out laptops or replacing laptops that are dropped on the ground. You're looking at a small thin client,    which is the fraction of the cost of a laptop. Plus, the data is no    longer kept in a laptop. There are no security or compliance issues.  You   can l just give them a thin client, and they are back in business.

 

It  makes everybody in this company, especially at the   top-level, nervous  to know that some sensitive data still does make it   out to the  laptops. We tell people to save everything to their network   drives,  but without using thin clients and virtual desktops, there's no   other  way to force that.

 

Gardner: How  about advice for   those folks that might be moving towards a more  modern DR journey, as   you described it? What would you advise to them  as they begin, and what   lessons might you have learned that you could  share?

Bauer: First off, do it. You're going to be glad that you did. The good thing    about this is that you can do it in parallel with your current DR   plans.  You don’t have to change your existing recovery plans. You can   take as  much time as you want to set it up right. And the key is to set   up a  demonstration for the key business owners and players that are   going to  make the decision on the change.

 

Set it up right with a   handful  of important apps, important VMs, and then just show it to   people. Once  they see how great it works, you're definitely going to   want to change.

 

It's always helpful to have some outside  help. No matter how skilled   you are, it's always good to have a second  pair of eyes look at the work   that you did, if for nothing more than  to confirm that you've done   everything you could and your plans are  solid. It's helpful to have a   partner like ICI.

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:

0 Comments Permalink

Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

When Hurricane Ike struck Texas in 2008, it became the second costliest hurricane ever to  make landfall   in the U.S. It was also a wake-up call for Houston-based  insurance wholesaler Myron Steves & Co., which was not struck directly but nonetheless realized its IT disaster recovery (DR) approach was woefully inadequate.

Supporting some 3,000 independent insurance   agencies in the Gulf Coast region,  with many insured properties in that active   hurricane zone, Myron  Steves must have all  it resources up and available, if and when severe  storms  strike.

The next BriefingsDirect discussion then centers on how Myron Steves, a small- to medium-sized business (SMB), developed and implemented a modern disaster recovery and business continuity strategy based on a high-degree of server and clients virtualization.

Learn how Tim Moudry, Associate Director of IT, and William Chambers, IT Operations Manager, both at Myron Steves, made a bold choice to go essentially 100 percent server virtualized in 90 days. That then set the stage for a faster, cheaper, and more robust DR capability. It also helped them improve their desktop-virtualization delivery, another important aspect of maintaining constant availability no mater what.

The discussion is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure:  VMware is a  sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:

Moudry: When Hurricane Ike came, we were using another DR support company, and  they gave us facilities to recover our data. They were also doing our  backups.

We    went to that site to recover systems, and we had a hard time  recovering   anything. We were testing it, and it was really cumbersome.  We tried to get servers up and running. We stayed there to recover one whole day and never got even a data center recovered.

So  William and I were chatting and thinking that there's got   to be a  better way. That’s when we started testing a lot of the other    virtualization software. We came to VMware, and it was just so easy to deploy.

We  made a proposal to our executive committee, and it was an easy sell. We  did the whole project for the price of one year of our old DR system.

Gardner: William, what were your top   concerns about change?

Chambers: Our top concerns were just avoiding what happened during Ike. In the  building we're in in Houston, we were without power for about a week. So  that was the number one cause for virtualization.

Number    two was just the amount of hardware. Somebody actually called us and    said, "Can you take these servers somewhere else and plug them in and    make them run?" Our response was no.

That was the lead into virtualization. If we wanted everything to be mobile like that, we had to go with a different route.

Then,  once you get into virtualization, you think, "Well, okay, this is going  to make us  mobile, and  we'll be able to recover somewhere else  quicker," but then  you start  seeing other features that you can use  that would benefit  what you are  doing at smaller physical size. It's  just the mobility of  the data  itself, if you’ve got storage in place  that will do it for  you. Recovery  times were cut down to nothing.

Simpler to manage


There    was ease of backups, everything that you have to do on a daily    maintenance schedule. It just made everything simpler to manage, faster    to manage, and so on.

Gardner: And so for you as an SMB with 200 employees,  what requirements were  involved? You  obviously don't have unlimited  resources and you don't  have a huge IT  staff.

Chambers: It’s probably  what any other IT shop wants. They want stability,   up-time,  manageability, and flexibility. That’s what any IT shop would   want, but  we're a small shop. So we had to do that with fewer  resources  than some  of the bigger Exxons and stuff like that.

Moudry: And it can't cost an arm and leg either. We're   an insurance broker.  We're not a carrier. We are between the carriers and   agents. With our  people being on the phone, up-time is essential,  because  they're on  the phone quoting all the time. That means if we  can’t  answer our  phones, the insurance agent down the street is going  to go  pick up the  phone, and they're going to get the business  somewhere else.

Also,    we do have claims. We don't process all claims, but we do some  claims,   mainly for our stuff that's on the coast. After a hurricane,  that’s  when  people are going to want that.

We   have to be up  all the time. When a disaster strikes, they are going to   say, "I need  to get my policy," and then they are going to want to go  to  our  website to download that policy, and we have to be up.

Gardner: Why did you go 100 percent virtualized in such a short time?

SAN storage

Chambers: We did that because we’ve got applications running on our servers, things like rating    applications, emails, our core applications. A while back, we   separated  the data volumes from the physical server itself. So the data   volume is  stored on a storage area network (SAN) that we get through an iSCSI.

That made it so easy for us to do a physical-to-virtual (P2V) conversion on the physical server. Then in the evenings, during our    maintenance period, we shut that physical server down and brought up  the   virtual connected to the SAN one, and we were good. That’s how we  got   through it so quickly.

Moudry: William moved us to VMware first, and then after we saw how VMware  worked so well, we tried out VMware View and it was just a no-brainer,  because of the issues that we had before with Citrix and because of the way Citrix works. One session affects all the    others. That’s where VMware shines, because everybody is on their    independent session.

Gardner: Where are your data centers?

Moving to colos


Moudry: Right now it’s Houston and San Antonio, but we are moving all of our equipment to colos, and we are going to be in Phoenix and Houston.

Gardner: So that’s even another layer of protection, wider geographic spread,    and just reducing your risk in general. Let’s take a moment and look  at   what you’ve done and see in a bit more detail what it’s gotten for  you.  Return on investment (ROI),    do you have any sense, having gone through this, what you are doing   now  that perhaps covered the cost of doing it in the first place?

Moudry: We spent about $350,000 a year in our past DR solution. We didn’t renew that, and the VMware DR paid for itself in the year.

We're working with automation. We're getting less of a   footprint for our employees. You just don’t hire as many.

And  we are not buying equipment like we used to. We had 70 servers   and  four racks. It compressed down to one rack. How many blades are we    running, William?

Chambers: We're  running 12 blades, and the per year maintenance cost on every   server  that we had compared to what we have now is 10 percent now of   what it  was.

Gardner: I notice that you're also a Microsoft shop. Did you look at their virtualization or DR? How come you didn’t go with Microsoft?

Chambers: We looked at one of their products first. We've used the Virtual PC   and Virtual Server products. Once you start looking at and evaluating    theirs, it’s a little more difficult setup. It runs well, but at that    time, I believe it was 2008, they didn’t have anything like the vCenter Site Recovery Manager (SRM) that I could find. It was a bit slower. All around, the product just wasn’t as good as the VMware product was.

Moudry: I remember when William was loading it. I think he spent probably   about  30 days loading Microsoft and he got a couple of machines running   on  it. It was probably about two or three machines on each host. I   thought,  "Man, this is pretty cool." But then he downloaded the free version of  VMware and tried the same thing on that. We got it up in two or three  days?

Chambers: I think it was three days to get the host loaded and then re-center all the products, and then it was great.

Moudry: Then he said that it was a little bit more expensive, but then we    weighed out all the cost of all the hardware that we were going to have    to spend with Microsoft. He loaded the VMware and he put about 10 VMs on one host.

Increased performance


It  was running great. It was awesome. I couldn’t believe that   that we  could get that much performance from one machine. You'd think   that  running 10 servers, you would get the most performance. I couldn’t    believe that those 10 servers were running just as fast on one server    that they did on 10.

Chambers: That was another key benefit. The footprint of ESXi was somewhat smaller than a Microsoft.

Moudry: It used the memory so much more efficiently.

Gardner: You mentioned vSphere, vCenter Site Recovery Manager, and View. Is that it? Are you up to the latest versions of those? What do you actually have in place and running?

Chambers: We have both in production right now, vCenter 4.1, and vCenter 5.0.    We’re migrating from 4.1 to 5.0. Instead of doing the traditional    in-place upgrade, we’ve got it set up to take a couple of hosts out of    the production environment, build them new from scratch, and then just    migrate VMs to it in the server environment.

It's    the same thing with the View environment. We’ve got enough hosts so  we   can take a couple out, build the new environment, and then just  start   migrating users to it.

It all happened much  quicker than we thought. Once we did a few of the   conversions, of the  physical servers that we had, and it went by so fast   that it just  happened that way. We were ahead of schedule on our   time-frames and  ahead on all of our budget numbers. Once we got   everything in our  physical production environment virtualized, then we   could start  building new virtual servers to replace the ones that we had    converted, just for better performance.

Without disruption


We  were able to do it without disruption, and that was one of the   better  things that happened. We could convert a physical server during   the  day, while people were still using it, or create that VM for it.   Then,  at night, we took the physical down and brought the virtual up,   and  they never knew it.

Gardner: How about some other metrics of success?

Copying the template

Moudry: Making new servers is nothing. William has a template. He just copies it and renames it.

Chambers: The deployment of new ones is 20 minutes. Then, we’ve got our    development people who come down and say, "I need a server just like the    production server to do some testing on before we move that into    production." That takes 10 minutes. All I have to do is clone that    production server and set it up for them to use for development. It’s so    fast and easy that they can get their work done much quicker.

Moudry: Rather than loading the Windows disk and having to load a server and get it all patched up.

Chambers: It gives you a like environment. In the past, where they tested on a    test server you built, that’s not exactly the same as the production    server. They could have bugs that they didn’t even know about yet, and    that just cuts down on the development time just a lot.

Gardner: Any advice for folks who are looking at the same type of direction,    higher virtualization, gaining the benefits of DR’s result and then    perhaps having more of that agility and flexibility? What might you have    learned in hindsight that you could share with some other folks?

Chambers: If you are going to use virtualization, then get  in and start using it on a small basis. Just to do a proof of concept, check performance, do all the due diligence that you need, and get into it. It will really pay off in the end.

Moudry: Have a change control system that monitors what you change. When we    first went over there, William was testing out the VMs, and I couldn’t    believe, as I was saying earlier, how fast it is. We have people who  are   on the phones. They're quoting insurance. They have to have the  speed.   If it hesitates, and that customer on the phone takes longer to  give  our  people the information and our people has hard time quoting  it,  we’re  going to lose the business.

When William put some of  these   packages over to the VM software, and it was not only running as  fast,   but it was running faster on the VM than it was on a hard box. I    couldn’t believe it. I couldn’t believe how fast it was.

Chambers: And there was another thing that we saw. We’ve got a lot of people    working at home now, just because of the View environment and things    like that. I think we’ve kind of neglected our inside people, because    they'd rather work in a View environment, because it's so much faster    than sitting on a local desktop.

Backbone speed

Moudry: When  somebody works at home,  they're at lightning speeds. Upstairs  is a  ghost town now, because  everybody wants to work from home. That’s  part  of our DR also. The model  is, "We have a disaster here. You go  work  from home." That means we  don’t have to put people into offices   anywhere, and with the Voice over  IP, it's like their call-center. They just call from home.

Chambers: They can work from different devices now, too. I know we’ve got   laptops  out there, iPads, different type of mobile devices, and it's   all  secure.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: HP.

Advanced and pervasive virtualization and cloud computing trends are driving the need for a better, holistic approach to IT support and remediation.

And    while the technology to support and fix virtualized environments   is  essential, it’s the people, skills, and knowledge to manage these    systems that provide the most decisive determinants of ongoing    performance success.

In a special BriefingsDirect sponsored podcast, created from a recent HP Expert Chat discussion on best practices for VMware environment support,  HP experts explain how they have made the service and support of global virtualization market leader VMware a top priority.

For example, Cindy Manderson, Technical Solutions Consultant for Complex Problem Resolution and Quality for VMware Products at HP, provides case studies for how managed escalation and  multi-vendor support around the globe can reduce downtime by 70 percent,  with large ROI benefits as well.

Other HP experts in the discussion include Pat Lampert, Critical Service Senior Technical Account Manager and Team Leader, as well as Sumithra Reddy,   HP Virtualization Engineer. The discussion is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.   [Disclosure: HP and VMware are both  sponsors of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Virtualization isn’t just server-by-server, but really impacts the entire data center. You need to think about it more holistically, particularly in regard to things like security,    performance and how your brands and businesses are perceived across   the  globe. Many of the companies that I deal with day in and day out   are up  at 80 percent and even 90 percent virtualized.

When they think about virtualization, they go beyond just server virtualization. It’s really now looking at storage, applications, networks and even the end-user desktop experience, or desktop as a service (VDI).

Successful  virtualization is no longer just about servers, it’s about managing  complexity when you get beyond the 20   percent or 30 percent level and  expand into converged infrastructure virtualization without failures.

So  how to take advantage of the best things  about virtualization? Part of  that means allowing your IT team to have  access to other experienced  support teams, from HP and VMware,  around  the world, 24×7, to help  keep systems up and running. Such support also  allows your IT team to  progress, to learn as they go,  and to be able to  take advantage of  more virtualization benefits over time.

Expert panel

So    how do you go about attaining such benefits? How do you keep the    positive side of virtualization on track? And how do you put in place an    insurance policy around service and support?

Manderson: We have several different packages. Our highest level is the mission-critical.   In this particular process, you're assigned a team that are across the   technology that you have in your environment. But you also get a set  of  folks who would actually look at not just the  reactive support and  even  some of the proactive, but how actually your  entire business is  running according to the ITIL standard.

That    is coupled with keeping you up and running, and we also can work with   you on a  type that would be best suited for your environment.

Our   critical and  independent support includes onsite resources from HP   that also include a  lot of proactive support. In addition, they're more   focused on specific  management, but that would be more of an ITSM technology. We can look at that for you.

... We  also have the hardware and software support. One of the cool things we have  with our hardware support is support automation, our Insight for remote support.   That can notify HP that you're having a disk  drive failure. Or we  will  call you and say that we know that disk drive is  failing, or  something  on a buffer server and storage is about to.

You can   even take  that a step further to look inside at the Windows operating  system.   We're hardware agnostic on that operating system. We don't  care about   the vendor -- and I believe we are looking at expanding  that automation  to  other operating systems. We have installation and  startup services  that  we can actually go out and set up and configure  the hardware and   software at a site.

So    we definitely integrate across all the multi-vendor services. We run    the gamut between all the x86 operating systems, as well as our  proprietary operating systems, our servers and storage. Again, we're no  stranger to multi-vendor support and keeping the entire environment up and  running.

... One of our most creative services would be Proactive Select,    a core product series of credits. You can use these credits for maybe    planning on migration and upgrade. You can say you need some  consulting   time. You can use these credits and work with upgrade and  migration.  You  may need some performance or you may need some type of   environmental  assessment, and these credits can be used for that.

Gardner: When people do employ these services,  how do they measure what the payoff is, the value of these services?

IDC study

Manderson: In 2010, IDC did a study. They went out and looked at the methodology, and this is  out on our website.   They saw that the customers who have the  mission-critical services,   reduce their downtime by over 70 percent, and  increase their return on investment (ROI) quite high, over 400 percent. The main benefit was in problem    management as well as help desk calls, because these were alleviated due    to the proactive nature, a lot of looking at the entire environment,    and looking at the business processes.

So take a look at the  study.   It shows IDC's methodology. So looking at things proactively and these   support processes can  certainly help you reduce that downtime.

... I've been in the multi-vendor space  for many, many years -- from applications to operating systems -- all  with HP.

In   2002, when VMware came on the scene, HP actually  became alliance   partners with them. In 2003, we became a reseller, and  thus began our   support partnership with them. It would only extend  recent in 2005, we   also became an OEM.  We have thousands of trained and certified Microsoft engineers and Linux professionals, too.

But    we have the largest number of VMware-certified professionals. We're    also have the largest global VMware off-site training center. So HP  also  does  education on these technologies as well. We’ve  trained over   20,000 students in the VMware space alone.

And we have had   this  very strong collaboration with VMware for many years and have   support  teams around the globe. In addition, we also offer the same   level of  training that VMware support engineers do. We actually go to   their  facilities and train right alongside them, too.

We further  do  this training virtually. The training is then recorded and made    available on demand for reference, for folks who are not able to attend    a scheduled course. There's definitely a very strong partnership, and    as you see from our history with the other vendors as well as VMware,  we   are no strangers to multi-vendor support.

With all of the VMware products that HP sells, we do provide support across them all. It runs the gamut from the vSphere operating system that will install on the x86 server, through the enterprise management to the vCenter, and virtual desktop infrastructure products like VMware ThinApp. We also support the converter product getting into vCloud Director.

In    addition to that, we have the ability to access our peers on the  other   teams across HP hardware support. This includes servers and   storage,  and our networking chain. We are quickly able to collaborate   with them  and pull together a virtual team in to focus on the   customer's whole  environment, to provide a one-stop shop.

Expertise across technologies

Additionally,   you saw that we’ve been in this multi-vendor support business for so   many years, with many experts across the other technologies, such as   Microsoft and Linux. Of course, the virtual machines (VMs) are running these operating systems. So if the contract is also with    them, we can easily pull them in to help us work an end-to-end  solution  and support it.

Gardner: Let’s think about what happens when there are  different levels of support at work. How does that shake-out?

Manderson: We're in a reactive support business. If the customer has a  problem,   they can either call in at their local region telephone number  --   whether they are in America, Europe, or Asia Pacific. There are    different phone numbers for them to call.

They can also log in    via the web, and they'll get to our next developer Level 1 engineer.    They're a great organization and have solved over 85 percent of their    cases.

If they have issues where they have to escalate, first    they will be collaborating with us. We also have an online chat tool,    where we are all in a virtual room, the Level 1 engineers, Level 2    engineers, etc. So we’ll be consulting and collaborating with them   before they  even get to a point of escalation.

If    the case does end up needing escalation, chances are they're already   collaborating with the first person, and will then end up taking the   case. That  saves a lot of information transfer, as far as what type of   server you  have, what’s the firmware, what build level, and what’s the   problem  there, etc.

Once it reaches Level 2 support, as far as   we can continue  to collaborate, we can reach our teammates and the   hardware teams, too, so  we can look at the server and make sure that   the environment is what we  need it to be. If we can't resolve it, we   can also go to Level 3 with  VMware at an offline service-partner level.

We   have a great  relationship with the folks that we work alongside with   and would escalate  calls to at VMware. We’re obviously not going into   Level 1 at VMware because we’ve  already done all that work, and we are  a  service partner. They'll go  right up to our peers over at VMware  and  then we work together, while  always owning the solution that we  provide  back to the customer.

Another  part of our infrastructure-as-a-support-organization is that  we  have a  single customer database. I can give an example. A call  came  into our  Level 1 French engineer. When this call came in, for the   European  folks, it was already the end of their day, and the French   engineer  could not speak English. It was a critical down, their VMs were    offline.

HP Virtual Room


So    we worked in a virtual room and they talked to us, and brought the    case to us here in America’s time zone. We worked with this case and    another tool called HP Virtual Room, where we could actually all look at the customers' desktops in real time. They happened to have EVA storage, and we quickly got an EVA engineer engaged. Of course, we  had   to find a resource in the Americas because the European folks had    already left. So we're all looking in real-time at the customer’s    environment and found out that they had locked the storage.

The    EVA engineer helped to get back online, while we all watched and the    French engineer was translating in French for the customer in order to   get it all resolved. We got it back online, and the customers were ready   to  home.

We gave instructions on getting log files and we   placed a  call for follow-up for the daytime hours in Europe the next   day. So our  counterparts in European support teams picked that up and   worked with  the customers to resolution, to analyze exactly what   happened and  prevent it in the future.

We have another  process in HP that can   actually go with top organizations, our  escalation  manager process. I  was lead source for a particular case  where we had a  field team  assisting a customer deploying a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) design. They had a third-party VDI vendor. They had HP hardware,    servers, and virtual connects. They had our storage, and we didn’t quite    know where the bottleneck was. They were having performance issues   by  trying to have this VDI at two different locations with the hardware  at   one site.

The escalation manager was able to get the local   office  to borrow equipment, and then try to get performance and    network traces. They had the Engineering Problem Management Resource    (EPMR) lab in Houston trying to duplicate the problems.

Our    escalation manager was able to drive the issue to completion across not    only the solution standards, but the local office, to owning the  actual   escalation with all the action items to keep this all on track.  We  knew  where we were going to go. That was about a six-month case,  but we  did  finally find was that the customer was on the technological  edge,  and the  "pipe" to have that performance just did not exist.

Site visits

Pat  Lampert is a technical account manager and does site  visits. The   technical account managers do go out on site. So we’re  aware of the   environment. We have the information of your environment  documented  into  the database. When you call, we’re not saying, "Now  what kind of  server  is this? What’s the firmware?"    We know this because we already have it documented. We could be   calling  them to say, "Server 3 is running a little off." We already   which know  VMware version this is on, because we have that information.

And    because we have that, we can also offer proactive advice. We can know    that there's a new firmware update, or VMware just came out with a  new   build, and we have a place where you can go find the latest that's    specific to your environment. So this helps to reduce further  incidents,   because we can be more proactive to help you maintain your  business.

Gardner: What are some of the the most frequent questions you receive from the field?

Reddy: I'll address two questions that are frequently showing up. One is, what is the difference between the VMware ESXi image and an HP ESXi image?

Basically,    HP takes the same ESXi image that VMware provides to the customers.  It   then adds HP thin components for hardware management, and it also  adds   any latest fibre channel and network drivers. Once it's tested and  certified, it's available for download both from HP and VMware websites.

Major differences

A
nd   one of the major difference between the two images is that VMware  image  is disk installable only, whereas HP image can be installed on a  disk, USB key, or a SD card.

The other question we're getting nowadays is how to upgrade from VCA4 to VCA5.    As with any major upgrades, planning helps. The first thing I would  do   is understand the difference between ESX 4 and ESX 5, because  starting   with ESX 5, we have no service console. So we need to  understand what   the architectural differences are.

Also learn about the new licensing policies. Then, use the System Analyzer that VMware provides to evaluate the current environments, and    download, check, and complete the checklist. Once this is done,    hopefully the upgrade will go smoothly.

Lampert: Another question that has come up from customers has to do with the   added value  of getting support directly from HP. It was partly   addressed during the  presentation we just gave. First of all, VMware   does have a fine  support organization. I have a couple of friends who work in VMware  Support, and they do a good job of supporting their product.

HP,    in addition to a similar level of expertise in the product, also   offers  our expertise in HP hardware, especially if you have systems   based on HP Blades.    The infrastructure behind that often is tied very closely to the    performance and availability of your ESX host. So when you call us, you    will have not only someone who is very familiar with the VMware   product,  but also is familiar with the HP hardware and able to pull in   the  proper resourced results, problems you might encounter with  running   vSphere on HP hardware especially.

In addition to that,  we have  a  partnership agreement with VMware, and when you call in for  support   through HP, you're getting that same level of service when we  have to  go  to VMware to get answers to questions or fixes.

One  other   question that has come up is about our lab ability to reproduce    problems. We have two global labs, one in India and one in the United    States. We have several static vSphere cluster configurations with a    number of different types of servers already in those configurations,    and the ability, when needed, to add specific models, if there is a    problem that’s specific to a particular Blade or rack-mounted server    model, or a particular card or something like that. So we're quite able    to reproduce most problems that come in. We even have some Dell and IBM equipment in our lab also.

Gardner: What other issues are users grappling with?

Reddy: One question I can answer is how to troubleshoot server crashes. When something goes wrong in ESX, we call it the "Purple Screen of Death."    Often, these are results of hardware failure, but we still need to   rule  out the software. So we collect all the logs, and look at it to   see if  it's a software issue. If it's not a software issue, then we   engage the  hardware team to see how we can get to the root cause and   fix the issue.

Lampert: To dovetail  with Sumithra’s  comment there, one of the questions I get  frequently  is what to do if  you don’t have a dump. Say the host hangs,  and that  seems to be almost  more common than the Purple Screen of Death.  Some  customers are't aware  that through HP’s Integrated Lights-Out  Management, there is the ability to generate a non-maskable interrupt (NMI) just by pressing a button, and by saving a certain environment variable ahead of time in your ESX host.

KB article

There is a KB article on this, by the way, if you just search on NMI and core dumping in    VMware. But with that setup, you can force a dump while a system is in a    hung state, and that will assist us usually in troubleshooting and    isolating what caused the hang, whether it be hardware or a problem with    the ESX host software.

One question that came up ahead  of time is what HP suggests as far as   getting a handle on our  inventory of VMs? I happened to be involved in   field testing some new  tools from HP that will be available in January   and February regarding  vSphere.

One of them is a Holistic Blade   and Firmware Analysis  that takes into account the VMware environment on   our Blade systems  which we are working on having ready soon. We have   just completed  field tests.

And the second is a really nifty   Inventory Report  HP has just put together. We're just completing field   tests on that  now. It will be available soon. Basically, we install a   small Perl script in the customer environment on any machine that has access to the vCenter host and has a vSphere CLI installed.

This Perl Script crawls through the VMware environment and builds an XML file, which we then feed into a report generator here at HP. This can    be used for us to gather information on customers, so we have ahead  of   time a clear picture of the environment. But also it will be sold  as a   service to customers.

The   report is really quite nice,  with all sorts of charts and showing   availability of machines and  availability of memory and also disk space.   It's a very nice report.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: HP. You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

Our   next VMworld case study interview focuses on how a major game developer  in Europe has successfully leveraged the hybrid cloud model.

We’ll learn how SEGA Europe is standardizing its cloud infrastructure across its on-premises operations, as well as with a public cloud    provider. The result is a managed and orchestrated hybrid environment to    test and develop multimedia games, one that dynamically scales   productively to the  many performance requirements at hand.

This story comes as part of a special BriefingsDirect podcast series from the recent VMworld 2011 Conference in Copenhagen. The series explores the latest in cloud computing and virtualization infrastructure developments.   [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here    to tell us more about how the hybrid approach to multiple,    complementary cloud instances is meeting SEGA’s critical development    requirements in a new way is Francis Hart, Systems Architect at SEGA Europe, in London. The case study interview is moderated by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Clearly one of the  requirements  in game development is the need to   ramp up a lot of servers to do the builds, but then they sit there essentially unproductive    between the builds. How did you flatten that out or manage the    requirements around the workload support?

Hart: Typically,  in the early stages of   development, there is a fair amount of testing  going on, and it tends   to be quite small -- the number of staff  involved in it and the number   of build iterations.

Going on,  when the game reaches to the end of its   product life-cycle, we’re  talking multiple game iterations a day and  the  game size has gotten  very large at that point. The number of people   involved in the testing  to meet the deadlines and get the game shipped   on date is into the  hundreds and hundreds of staff.

Gardner: How has virtualization and moving your workloads into different locations evolved over the years?

Hart: We work on the idea of having a central platform for a lot of these    systems. Using virtualization to do that allowed us to scale off at    certain times. Historically, we always had an on-premise VMware platform to do this. Very recently, we’ve been looking at ways to use that resource within a cloud to cut down from some of Capex loading but also remain a little bit more agile with some of the larger titles, especially online games that are coming around.

Gardner: We’re all very familiar with the amazing video games that are being  created nowadays. And SEGA of course is particularly well-known for the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise going back a number of years. What are some of the other critical requirements that   you have from a systems architecture perspective when developing these games?

Hart: We have a lot of development studios across the world. We're working on  multiple projects.   We need to ensure that we supply them with a  highly scalable and   reliable solution in order to test, develop, and  produce the game and   the code in time. ... We’re probably   looking at  thousands of individual developers across the world.

... The  first part was dealing with the end of the   process, and that was the  testing and the game release process. Now,   we’re going to be working  back from that. The next big area that we’re   actively involved in is  getting our developers to develop online games   within the hybrid  environment.

So they’re designing the game and   the game’s  back-end servers to be optimal within the VMware  environment.  And  then, also pushing from staging to live is a very  simple process  using  the Cloud Connector.

We're restructuring and   redesigning the  IT systems within SEGA to be more of a development   operations team to  provide a service to the developers and to the   company.

Gardner: How did you start approaching that from your  IT  environment, to build the right infrastructure?

Targeting testing

Hart: One of the first areas we targeted very early on was the last process    in those steps, the testing, arguably one of the most time-consuming    processes within the development cycle.    It happens pretty much all the way through as well to ensure that the    game itself behaves as it should, it’s tested, and the customer gets   the  end-user experience they require.

The biggest technical  goal   that we had for this is being able to move large amounts of data,    un-compiled code, from different testing offices around the world to  the   staff. Historically we had some major issues in securely moving  that   data around, and this is what we started looking into cloud  solutions   for this.

For very, very large game builds, and we're talking game builds above 10 gigabytes,  it ended up being couriered within the country and then overnight file  transfer outside of the country. So, very old school methods.

We    needed both to secure that up to make sure we understood where the   game  builds were, and also to understand exactly which version each of   the  testing offices was using. So it’s gaining control, but also   providing  more security.

Gardner: So we’re seeing a lot more of the role-play games (RPG) types of games, games themselves in the cloud. That must influence   what  you're doing in terms of thinking about your future direction.

Hart: Absolutely. We’ve been looking at things like the hybrid cloud model with VMware as a development platform for our developers. That's really what  we're   working on now. We've got a number of games in the pipeline that  have   been developed on the hybrid cloud platform. It gives the  developers a   platform that is exactly the same and mirrored to what it  would   eventually be in the online space through ISPs like Colt, which should be hosting the virtual cloud platform.

Gaining cost benefits

And one of the benefits we're seeing in the VMware offering is that regardless of what data center in the world is the standard platform, it also allows us to leverage    multiple ISPs, and hopefully gain some cost benefits from that.

Very   early on we were in discussions with Colt and also VMware to understand   what technology stack they were bringing into the cloud. We started   doing a proof of concept with VMware and a professional services company, and together we were    able to come over a proof of concept to distribute our game testing    code, which previously was a very old-school distribution system. So    anything better would improve the process.

There wasn't too much    risk to the company. So we saw the opportunity to have a hybrid cloud    set up to allow us to have an internal cloud system to distribute the    codes to the majority of UK game testers and to leverage high  bandwidth   between all of our sites.

For the game testing studios around Europe and the world, we could use a hosted version of the same service which was up on the Colt Virtual Cloud Director (VCD) platform to supply this to trusted testing studios.

Gardner: When you approach this hybrid cloud model, what about managing that?   What  about having a view into what’s going on so that you know what   aspects  of the activity and requirements are being met and where?

Hart: The virtual cloud environment of vCloud Director has a web portal that allows you to manage a lot of this configuration in a central way. We’re also using VMware Cloud Connector,    which is a product that allows you to move the apps between different    cloud data centers. And doing this allows us to manage it at one    location and simply clone the same system to another cloud data center.

In    that regard, the configuration very much was in a single place for us    in the way that we designed the proof of concept. It actually helped    things, and the previous process wasn’t ideal anyway. So it was a    dramatic improvement.

One of the immediate benefits was  around the design process. It's very   obvious that we were tightening  up security within our build delivery  to  the testing studios. Nothing  was with a courier on a bike anymore,  but  within a secured transaction  between the two offices.

Risk greatly reduced

Also    from a security perspective, we understood exactly what game assets   and  builds were in each location. So it really helped the product    development teams to understand what was where and who was using what,    and so from a risk point of view it’s greatly reduced.

In terms of stats and the amount of data throughput, it’s pretty large, and we’ve been moving terabytes pretty much weekly nowadays. Now we’re going completely live with the distribution network.

So    it’s been a massive success. All of the UK testing studios are using    the build delivery system day to day, and for the European ones we’ve    got about half the testing studios on board that build delivery system    now, and it’s transparent to them.

VMware was very  good at allowing us to understand  the technology and  that's one of the  benefits of working with a  professional services  reseller. In terms  of gotchas,  there weren't too  many. There were a lot  of good surprises that came  up and allowed us  to open the door to a lot  of other VMware  technologies.

Now, we're also looking at alternating a lot of processes within vCenter Orchestrator and other VMware products. They really gave us a good stepping stone into the VMware catalogue, rather than just vSphere, which we were using previously. That was very handy for us.

Gardner: I’d like to just pause here for a second. Your use of vSphere 4.1  must have been an important   stepping stone to be able to have the  dynamic ability to ramp up and   down your environments, your support  infrastructure, but also skills.

Hart: Absolutely. We already have a fair footprint in Amazon Web Services (AWS),    and it was a massive skill jump that we needed to train members of  the   staff in order to use that environment. With the VMware  environment,  as  you said, we already have a large amount of skill set  using vSphere.  We  have a large team that supports our corporate  infrastructure and  we've  actually got VMware in our co-located public  environment as well.  So it  was very, very assuring that the skills  were immediately  transferable.

Gardner: Now that you've done this, any words   of wisdom, 20/20 hindsight, that  you might share with others who are   considering moving more  aggressively into private cloud, hybrid cloud,   and ultimately perhaps  the full PaaS value?

Hart: Just get some hands-on experience and play with the cloud stack from  VMware. It’s inexpensive to have a go and just get to know the  technology stack.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

This BriefingsDirect podcast discussion centers on how worldwide enterprise applications leader SAP has designed and implemented a private cloud infrastructure models that supports an internal consulting and training program.

By standardizing on a VMware cloud platform, SAP has been able to slash provisioning times for multiple instances of   its  flagship application suite in the training setting, as well as set  the stage for wider adoption  of cloud models.

Here  to tell us about the technical and productivity benefits of private  clouds is Dr. Wolfgang Krips, Senior Vice President of   Global  Infrastructure at SAP in Walldorf, Germany. The interview is  conducted by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of Briefings Direct podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: What is it about private cloud that made the  most  sense for SAP?

Krips: Expanding a bit on the use case, there is a specific challenge here. In  the training business,   people book their courses, and we know only on  Friday evening who is   attending the course on Monday. So we have only  a very short amount  of  time over the weekend to set up the systems. That was one of the big   challenges that we had to solve.

The  second challenge is that,  at  the same time, these systems become more  and more mission critical.   Customers are saying, "If the system isn't  available during the course,   I'm not willing to pay." Maybe the  customer will rebook the course.   Sometimes he doesn’t. That means that  if the systems aren't available,   we have an immediate revenue impact.

You  can imagine that if we   have to set up a couple of hundred, or  potentially a couple of thousand,   systems over the weekend, we need a  high degree of automation to do   that. In the past, we had homegrown scripts,    and there was a lot of copying and stuff like that going on. We were    looking into other technologies and opportunities to make life easier    for us.

A couple of challenges were that the scripts and the    automation that we had before were dependent on the specific hardware    that we used, and we can't use the same hardware for each of the    courses. We have different hardware platforms and we had to adopt all    the scripts to various hardware platforms.

When we virtualized and used virtualization technology, we could make use of linked cloning technology, which    allowed us to set up the systems much faster than the original copying    that we did.

The second thing was that by introducing the    virtualization layer, we became almost hardware independent, and that    cut the effort in constructing or doing the specific automation    significantly.

Gardner: What did you need to put in place, and how difficult was  it?

The important piece

Krips: Luckily, we already had some experience. The big thing in setting up the cloud is not getting, say, vSphere in place and the basic virtualization technology. It's the    administration and making it available in self-service or the automation    of the provisioning. That is the important piece, as most would have    guessed.

We had some experience with the Lifecycle Manager and the Lab Manager before. So we said at that time because we did this last year, we set    up a Lab Manager installation and worked with that to realize this  kind   of private cloud.

In this specific cloud, typically we have between a couple of hundred  and a couple of thousand VMs running. Overall, at SAP we're running more  than 20,000 virtual machines (VMs). And, in fact, I have about 25 private cloud  installations.

... As I mentioned, this cloud has to  work. If this goes down, it’s  not  like some kind of irrelevant test  system is down -- or test system  pool  -- and we can take up another one.  Potentially a lot of training   courses are not happening. With respect to  mission criticality, this   cloud was essential.

Gardner: We often hear similar  requirements being applied to a test and  development environment. Are some of your clouds involved  with the test  and development as well?

Krips: As I mentioned before, we have 25 private-cloud installations,   and in  fact, most of them are with development. We also have cloud    installations in the demo area. So if sales people are providing demos,    there are certain landscapes or resource pools where we are    instantiating demo systems.

SAP wants to shorten the innovation   cycles. Internally, we've  moved internally to a development  model,  where every six weeks  development provides potentially a  shippable  release. It doesn’t mean  that the release gets shipped, but  we’re  running through the whole  process of developing something,  testing it,   and validating it. There  is a demonstrable release  available every  six weeks.

In    the past, with a traditional model, if we were provisioning physical    hardware, it took us about 30 days or so to provision a development    system. Now, if you think about a development cycle of six weeks and    you’re taking about nearly the same amount of time for provisioning the    development system, you’ll see that there is a bit of a mismatch.

Moving to the private cloud and doing this in self-service, today we can provision development systems within hours.

Gardner: That’s what I hear from a number of organizations,   and it's very  impressive. When you had a choice of different   suppliers, vendors, and  professional services organizations, was there   everything that led you  specifically to VMware, and how has that  worked  out?

Krips: I can give you a fairly straightforward  answer. At the time we  started  working with private cloud and  private-cloud installations,  VMware was  the most advanced provider of  that technology, and I'd  argue that it is  still today.

Gardner: How about security and management benefits?

Very reluctant

Krips: From   our perspective, we wanted to have the advantages of cloud with   respect  to flexibility, provisioning speed, but we didn’t want to have   more  security headaches than we already had. That’s why we said,  "Let's  get  our arms first around a private cloud."

Gardner: Is there something about a standardized  approach to your cloud stack   that makes that hybrid potential, when  you’re ready to do it, when  it's  the right payload, something that  you'll be pursuing?

Krips: That’s one of our biggest problems that we're having. Clearly, if one had a standard cloud interface like a vCloud interface, and it was the industry norm, that would be extremely    helpful. The issue is that, as you can imagine, there are a couple of    workloads that we also want to test in some other well known clouds. I'm  having a bit of a headache over how to connect to multiple   clouds.

... Now, if a couple of interesting providers had a standardized   cloud interface, it would be very nice for me.

Gardner: Any thoughts about what your experience and benefits with cloud might  mean for your future vision around client devices and mobility?

Krips: Dana, the thing is pretty clear. If you look at the strategy that SAP  pursues, mobility is an integral part.   We also think that not only that  business process mobility is more   important, but what we’re also seeing,  and I mentioned that before,   with the agility and development. So for  instance, there are people who   are working every couple of months in new  teams. For us, it's very   important that we separate the user data and  the desktop from the   device. We’re definitely pushing very strongly into  the topic of desktop virtualization (VDI).

SaaS application

T
he    big challenge that we’re currently having is that when you’re moving   to  VDI, you take everything that’s on the user's desktop today, then   you  make out of that more or less  a software-as-a-service (SaaS) application. As you can imagine, if you’re doing that to development,    and they are doing some complex development for the user interfaces  or   stuff like that, this puts certain challenges on the latency that you can have to the data center or the processing power that you need to have in the back-end.

From    our side, we’re interested in technologies similar to that view, and    where you can check out machines and still run on a VDI client, but    leverage the administrative and provisioning advantages that you have    through the cloud provisioning for virtual desktops. So it's a pretty    interesting challenge.

We understand what kind of benefits we’re    getting from the cloud operations, as I said, the center provisioning,    application patching, improved license management, there are a lot of things that are very, very important to us and that we want to leverage.

Particularly for us, the VDI, the benefits, are very much in the kind  of   centralized provisioning. Just to give you an example, imagine how   easy  it would be if you’re doing desktop virtualization, to move from Windows 7 to Windows 8. You could basically flip a switch.

On    the other hand, we have to solve the issue that we’re not blowing the    business case, because the processing power and the storage that you    have at the end point is relatively cheap. That’s why we were so  interested in VDI technologies. That would allow us also to take care of    all of our mobile users.

But we’re confident that we can get the business case to work.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: AccelOps. Connect with AccelOps: Linkedin, TwitterFacebook, RSS.

The  latest BriefingsDirect podcast discussion centers on how new data and  analysis approaches are significantly improving IT operations  monitoring, as well as providing stronger security.

The conversation examines how AccelOps has developed technology that correlates events with relevant data   across IT systems, so that operators can gain much better  insights   faster, and then learn as they go to better predict future  problems   before they emerge. That's because advances in big data analytics and complex events processing (CEP) can come together to provide deep and real-time, pattern-based insights into large-scale IT operations.

Here  to explain how these new solutions can drive better IT   monitoring and  remediation response -- and keep those critical systems   performing at  their best -- is Mahesh Kumar, Vice President of Marketing at AccelOps. The discussion is moderated by  Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: AccelOps is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Is  there a  fundamental change in how we approach the data that’s  coming  from IT  systems in order to get a better monitoring and  analysis  capability?

Kumar: The data has to be analyzed in  real-time. By real-time I mean in  streaming mode before the data hits  the disk. You need to be able to  analyze it and make decisions. That's  actually  a very efficient way of  analyzing information. Because you  avoid a  lot of data sync issues and  duplicate data, you can react  immediately  in real time to remediate  systems or provide very early  warnings in  terms of what is going wrong.

The challenges in doing  this streaming-mode analysis are scale and speed. The traditional  approaches with pure relational databases alone are not equipped to  analyze data in this manner. You need new   thinking and new approaches to  tackle this analysis problem.

Gardner: Also for issues of  security, offeners are trying different types of attacks.  So  this needs to be in real-time as well?

Kumar: You might be familiar with advanced persistent threats (APTs).    These are attacks where the attacker tries their best to be  invisible.   These are not the brute-force attacks that we have  witnessed in the   past. Attackers may hijack an account or gain access  to a server, and   then over time, stealthily, be able to collect or  capture the   information that they are after.

These  kinds of threats cannot be   effectively handled only by looking  at  data historically, because  these  are activities that are happening  in  real-time.



These kinds of threats cannot be   effectively  handled only by looking at data historically, because  these  are  activities that are happening in real-time, and there are  very,  very  weak signals that need to be interpreted, and there is a  time  element  of what else is happening at that time.   This too calls for  streaming-mode analysis.

If you notice, for   example, someone  accessing a server, a database administrator accessing a   server for  which they have an admin account, it gives you a certain   amount of  feedback around that activity. But if on the other hand, you   learn  that a user is accessing a database server for which they don’t   have  the right level of privileges, it may be a red flag.

You   need  to be able to connect this red flag that you identify in one   instance  with the same user trying to do other activity in different   kinds of  systems. And you need to do that over long periods of time in   order to  defend yourself against APTs.

Gardner: It's always been difficult to gain accurate analysis of large-scale IT  operations, but  it seems that this is getting more difficult. Why?

Kumar: If you look at trends, there are on average about 10 virtual machines (VMs) to a physical server.    Predictions are that this is going to increase to about 50 to 1,  maybe   higher, with advances in hardware and virtualization  technologies. The increase in density of VMs is a complicating   factor  for capacity planning, capacity management, performance   management,  and security.

In a very short period of time, you have in effect    seen a doubling of the size of the IT management problem. So there are  a   huge number of VMs to manage and that introduces complexity and a  lot   of data that is created.

Cloud computing

Cloud computing is another big trend. All analyst research and customer feedback suggests that we're  moving to a hybrid model, where you have some workloads on a public  cloud, some in a private cloud, and some running in a traditional data center. For this, monitoring has to work in a distributed environment, across multiple controlling parties.

Last    but certainly not the least, in a hybrid environment, there is    absolutely no clear perimeter that you need to defend from a security    perspective. Security has to be pervasive.

Given these new    realities, it's no longer possible to separate performance monitoring    aspects from security monitoring aspects, because of the distributed    nature of the problem. ... So change is happening much more quickly and  rapidly   than ever before. At the very least, you need monitoring and  management   that can keep pace with today’s rate of change.

At the very least, you need monitoring and management   that can keep pace with today’s rate of change.



The  basic problem you need to address is one of analysis.   Why is that? As we  discussed earlier, the scale of systems is really   high. The pace of  change is very high. The sheer number of   configurations that need to be  managed is very large. So there's data   explosion here.

Since you  have a plethora of information coming   at you, the challenge is no longer  collection of that information.  It's  how you analyze that information  in a holistic manner and provide   consumable and actionable data to your  business, so that you're able  to  actually then prevent problems in the  future or respond to any  issues  in real-time or in near real-time.

You  need to nail the   real-time analytics problem and this has to be the  centerpiece of any   monitoring or management platform going forward.

Advances in IT

Gardner: So we have the modern data center, we have issues of complexity and    virtualization, we have scale, we have data as a deluge, and we need to    do something fast in real-time and consistently to learn and relearn   and  derive correlations.

It turns out that there are some   advances  in IT over the past several years that have been applied to   solve  other problems that  can be brought to bear here. You've looked  at what's being done with big data and in-memory  architectures, and you've also looked at some of the great work that’s  been done in services-oriented architecture (SOA) and CEP, and you've put these together in an interesting way.

Big data is   about volume, the velocity or the speed with which the data comes in and   out, and the variety or the number of different data types and sources   that are being indexed and managed.



Kumar: Clearly there is a big-data angle to this.

Doug Laney, a META and a Gartner analyst, probably put it best when he highlighted that big data is    about volume, the velocity or the speed with which the data comes in and    out, and the variety or the number of different data types and sources   that are being indexed and managed.

For    example, in an IT management paradigm, a single configuration setting    can have a security implication, a performance implication, an    availability implication, and even a capacity implication in some cases.    Just a small change in data has multiple decision points that are    affected by it. From our angle, all these different types of criteria    affect the big data problem.

Couple of approaches

There  are a couple of approaches.   Some companies are doing some really  interesting work around big-data   analysis for IT operations.

They  primarily focus on gathering the   data, heavily indexing it, and  making it available for search, thereby   derive analytical results. It  allows you to do forensic analysis that   you were not easily able to  with traditional monitoring systems.

The   challenge with that  approach is that it swings the pendulum all the  way  to the other end.   Previously we had a very rigid, well-defined   relational data-models  or data structures, and the index and search   approach is much more of a  free form. So the pure index-and-search type of an approach is sort of the other end of the spectrum.

What    you really need is something that incorporates the best of both  worlds   and puts that together, and I can explain to you how that can  be   accomplished with a more modern architecture. To start with, we  can't do   away with this whole concept of a model or a relationship  diagram or   entity relationship map. It's really critical for us to  maintain that.

What   you really need is something that incorporates the best of both worlds   and puts that together.



I’ll    give you an example. When you say that a server is part of a  network   segment, and a server is connected to a switch in a particular  way,  it  conveys certain meaning. And because of that meaning, you can  now   automatically apply policies, rules, patterns, and automatically    exploit the meaning that you capture purely from that relationship. You    can automate a lot of things just by knowing that.

If you stick    to a pure index-and-search approach, you basically zero out a lot of    this meaning and you lose information in the process. Then it's the    operators who have to handcraft these queries to have to then    reestablish this meaning that’s already out there. That can get very,    very expensive pretty quickly.

Our approach to this big-data   analytics  problem is to take a hybrid approach. You need a flexible and   extensible  model that you start with as a foundation, that allows you   to then  apply meaning on top of that model to all the extended data   that you  capture and that can be kept in flat files and searched and   indexed. You  need that hybrid approach in order to get a handle on this   problem.

Gardner: Why do you need  to think about the architecture that  supports  this big data capability  in order for it to actually work in  practical  terms?

Kumar: You start with a fully  virtualized  architecture, because it allows  you not only to scale  easily, ... but you're able to reach  into these  multiple disparate environments and  capture and analyze and  bring that  information in. So virtualized  architecture is absolutely  essential.

Auto correlate

Maybe    more important is the ability for you to auto-correlate and analyze    data, and that analysis has to be distributed analysis. Because  whenever   you have a big data problem, especially in something like IT    management, you're not really sure of the scale of data that you need  to   analyze and you can never plan for it.

Think of it as applying a MapReduce type of algorithm to IT management problems, so that you can do    distributed analysis, and the analysis is highly granular or specific.    In IT management problems, it's always about the specificity with which    you analyze and detect a problem that makes all the difference  between   whether that product or the solution is useful for a customer  or not.

In  IT management problems, it's always about the specificity with which     you analyze and detect a problem that makes all the difference.



A major advantage of distributed  analytics is that you're freed from   the scale-versus-richness trade-off,  from the limits on the type of   events you can process. If I wanted to  do more complex events and   process more complex events, it's a lot  easier to add compute capacity   by just simply adding VMs and scaling  horizontally. That’s a big  aspect  of automating deep forensic analysis  into the data that you're   receiving.

I want to add a little bit  more about the richness  of  CEP. It's not just around capturing data and  massaging it or  looking  at it from different angles and events. When we  say CEP, we  mean it is  advanced to the point where it starts to capture  how people  would  actually rationalize and analyze a problem.

The  only way   you can automate your monitoring systems end-to-end and get  more of  the  human element out of it is when your CEP system is able to  capture   those nuances that people in the NOC and SOC would normally use to rationalize when they look at events. You not    only look at a stream of events, you ask further questions and then    determine the remedy.

No hard limits

To    do this, you should have a rich data set to analyze, i.e. there    shouldn’t be any hard limits placed on what data can participate in the    analysis and you should have the flexibility to easily add new data    sources or types of data. So it's very important for the architecture to    be able to not only event on data that are is stored in in  traditional   models or well-defined relational models, but also event  against data   that’s typically serialized and indexed in flat file databases.

Gardner: What's the  payoff if you do this  properly?

Kumar: It is no surprise that our  customers don’t come to  us saying we have a big data problem, help us  solve a big data problem,  or we have a complex event problem.

Customers say they are so  interconnected that they want these managed  on a common platform.



Their   needs are really around  managing security, performance and   configurations. These are three  interconnected metrics in a virtualized   cloud environment. You can't  separate one from the other. And   customers say they are so  interconnected that they want these managed   on a common platform. So  they're really coming at it from a   business-level or outcome-focused  perspective.

What AccelOps   does under the covers, is apply  techniques such as big-data analysis,   complex driven processing, etc.,  to then solve those problems for the   customer. That is the key payoff --  that customer’s key concerns that I   just mentioned are addressed in a  unified and scalable manner.

An   important factor for customer  productivity and adoption is the  product  user-interface. It is not of  much use if a product leverages  these  advanced techniques but makes the  user interface complicated --  you end  up with the same result as before.  So we’ve designed a UI that’s very easy to use, requires one or two clicks to get the    information you need; a UI-driven ability to compose rich events and   event  patterns. Our customers find this very valuable, as they do not   need  super-specialized skills to work with our product.

Key metrics

What  we've built is a platform that monitors data center performance,    security, and configurations. The three key interconnected metrics in    virtualized cloud environments. Most of our customers really want that    combined and integrated platform. Some of them might choose to start    with addressing security, but they soon bring in the performance    management aspects into it also. And vice versa.

And we take a  holistic cross-domain perspective -- we span server, storage, network,  virtualization and applications. What   we've really built is a common  consistent platform that addresses  these  problems of performance,  security, and configurations, in a  holistic  manner and that’s the main  thing that our customers buy from  us today.

Free trial download

Most of our customers start off with the free trial download. It’s a very simple process. Visit www.accelops.com/download and download a virtual appliance trial that you can install in your data center within your firewall very quickly and easily.

Getting    started with the AccelOps product is pretty simple. You fire up the    product and enter the credentials needed to access the devices to be    monitored. We do most of it agentlessly, and so you just enter the    credentials, the range that you want to discover and monitor, and that’s    it. You get started that way and you hit Go.

We  do most of it agentlessly, and so you just enter the   credentials,   the range that you want to discover and monitor, and that’s   it.



The  product then   uses this information to determine what’s in the  environment. It   automatically establishes relationships between them,  automatically   applies the rules and policies that come out of the box  with the   product, and some basic thresholds that are already in the  product that   you can actually start measuring the results. Within a  few hours of   getting started, you'll have measurable results and  trends and graphs   and charts to look at and gain benefits from it.

Gardner: It   seems that as we move toward cloud and mobile that at some point  or   another organizations will hit the wall and look for this  automation   alternative.

Kumar: It’s about automation and distributed   analytics and about getting very  specific with the information that you   have, so that you can make  absolutely more predictable, 99.9 percent   correct of decisions and do  that in an automated manner. The only way   you can do that is if you  have a platform that’s rich enough and   scalable and that allows you to  then reach that ultimate goal of   automating most of the management of  these diverse and disparate   environments.

That’s something  that's sorely lacking in products   today. As you said, it's all  brute-force today. What we have built is a   very elegant, easy-to-use  way of managing your IT problems, whether  it’s  from a security  standpoint, performance management standpoint, or   configuration  standpoint, in a single integrated platform. That's   extremely  appealing for our customers, both enterprise and cloud-service    providers.

I also want to take this opportunity to encourage  those of your listening or reading this podcast to come meet our team at  the 2011 Gartner Data Center Conference, Dec. 5-9, at Booth 49 and  learn more. AccelOps is a silver sponsor of the conference.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: AccelOps. Connect with AccelOps: Linkedin, TwitterFacebook, RSS.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Advanced and pervasive virtualization and  cloud computing trends are  driving the need for a better, holistic  approach to IT support    and  remediation.  Keeping virtualized servers that support mission-critical  applications  and databases     at top levels of performance 24 x 7 is a much   different problem  than    for maintaining physical servers in  traditional  configurations.

That's why HP has made the service and support of  global virtualization market leader VMware implementations a top  priority. And while the technology to  support and fix these     virtualized environments is essential, the people,  skills and  knowledge    to manage these systems are perhaps the most  decisive  elements of    ongoing performance success.

Live discussion


T
o find out more, I'll be moderating a live deep-dive discussion on Dec. 7,      with a group of HP experts to explore how to make the most of the      available people,  technology and processes to provide an insurance      policy against  systems failure. [Disclosure: HP and VMware are both sponsors of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

The stakes have never been  higher for keeping applications and business up and running.


Register now as seats are limited for this free HP Expert Chat.

In  this discussion,      you'll hear latest recommendations for how IT  support should  be    done   -- even amid a rapidly changing IT  landscape of virtualized,     hybrid  and  cloud computing.      First in the hour-long multi-media  presentation, comes  the inside    story   of how modern service and support  works from one of  HP's  top    services  experts, Cindy Manderson, Technical  Solutions  Consultant for Complex Problem Resolution & Quality for  VMware  Products, who has 27-plus years experience with HP, and eight-plus years   supporting VMware.

After Cindy's chat, viewers will be invited to participate in the interactive question-and-answer session with actual HP    VMware    experts. Moreover, both questions and answers will be     automatically    translated into 13 major languages to demonstrate how  service   and support    services know no boundaries,  time zones or  language   barriers.

Register now as seats are limited for this free HP Expert Chat.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Most  enterprises, service providers and governments have ramped-up their use  of virtualization over the past several years, with many impressive  results.    Those  paybacks can only continue, however, if the overall  service   and  support  of these complex and dynamic environments keeps  pace.

The problem of effectively troubleshooting issues across  virtualized data centers consisting of many products from many suppliers  is daunting. But  there's an added element. The stakes have never been  higher for keeping  applications and business up and running. Indeed, a     businesses' IT  systems are increasingly the actual business itself.    It's  hard to  separate them.

The stakes have never been  higher for keeping applications and business up and running.



HP has made the service and support of  global virtualization market leader VMware implementations a top  priority. Keeping virtualized servers that support mission-critical applications and databases at top levels of performance 24 x 7 is a much  different problem  than    for maintaining physical servers in traditional  configurations.     [Disclosure: HP and VMware are both sponsors of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Indeed,  advanced and pervasive virtualization and  cloud computing trends are  driving the need for a better, holistic  approach to IT support    and  remediation. And while the technology to  support and fix these     virtualized environments is essential, the people,  skills and  knowledge    to manage these systems is perhaps the most  decisive  element of    ongoing performance success.

Live discussion


T
o find out more, I'll be moderating a live deep-dive discussion on Dec. 7,      with a group of HP experts to explore how to make the most of the      available people, technology and processes to provide an insurance      policy against failure.

Register to reserve a place for this free HP Expert Chat on Dec. 7.

Overall,      you'll hear recommendations for how IT support can and should  be    done   -- even amid a rapidly changing IT landscape of virtualized,     hybrid  and  cloud computing.     First in the hour-long multi-media  presentation, is  the inside   story   of how modern service and support  works from one of  HP's top    services  experts, Cindy Manderson, Technical  Solutions  Consultant for Complex Problem Resolution & Quality for  VMware  Products, who has 27-plus years experience with HP, and eight-plus years   supporting VMware.

She  will provide a short overview on the  HP/VMware relationship and how   the HP/VMware software    support model  uniquely enables always-on  support  for enterprises,    service providers  and governments. She’ll  also present  several case    studies of how the HP  Call Center global support process has solved problems in  VMware environments.

After Cindy's chat, viewers will be invited to participate in the interactive questions and answer session with actual HP   VMware    experts. Moreover, both questions and answers will be    automatically    translated into 13 languages to demonstrate how service   and support    services know no boundaries,  time zones or language   barriers.

Leading   these interactive sessions to answer the audience's questions live  will  be several additional  HP-VMware support experts, including Patrick  Lampert,    a Critical  Service Senior Technical Account Manager and Team  Leader    responsible  for delivery and management of VMware Technical   Services   for Fortune  500 HP Custom Mission Critical Service  Customers.

He'll be joined by Sumithra Reddy,   Virtualization Engineer with HP Technology Services in the Global   Competency  Center, a 27-year veteran of software support, with a current   focus  on VMware. Other experts will join from Europe and Asia.

Register to reserve a place for this free HP Expert Chat on Dec. 7.

In  sum, attendees will see how the breadth of virtualization is extending from  servers to networks, desktop clients, storage, and mobile clients. All  must operate in conjunction with the rest, especially   as   virtualized  workloads come and go based on dynamic demand. This   means   that  understanding how VMware and its ecosystem of vendors   supporting  these  advanced  environments relate. Problems in these   environments  must be  solved from an over-view and neutral perspective,  with  all the interdependencies considered  and managed.

So join the online presentation, discussion and question-and-answer sessions in nearly any major language worldwide. This is the   first in a series of Expert Chats that I'll be moderating and    that  will  tackle serious IT issues, with full global language  support.


You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

Our    next VMworld case study interview focuses on how Germany’s largest  travel agency has   remade their PC landscape across 580 branch offices  using virtual desktops. We’ll learn how Germany’s DER Deutsches Reisebüro redefined the desktop delivery vision and successfully implemented 2,300 Windows XP desktops as a service.

This story comes as part of a special BriefingsDirect podcast series from the recent VMworld 2011 Conference in Copenhagen. The series explores the latest in cloud computing and virtualization infrastructure developments.   [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here    to tell us what this major VDI deployment did in terms of business,    technical, and financial payoffs is Sascha Karbginski, Systems   Engineer  at DER Deutsches Reisebüro, based in Frankfurt. The discussion  is moderated by  Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Why were virtual desktops such an important direction for you? Why did it make sense for your organization?

Karbginski: In our organization, we’re talking about 580 travel agencies all over the country,    all over Germany, with 2,300 physical desktops, which were not in our    control. We had life cycles out there of about 4 or 5 years. We had  old   PCs with no client backups.

The    biggest reason is that recovery times at our workplace were 24 hours    between hardware change and bringing back all the software    configuration, etc. Desktop virtualization was a chance to get the    desktops into our data center, to get the security, and to get the controls.

DER  in Germany   is the number one in travel agencies. As I said, we're  talking about   580 branches. We’re operating as a leisure travel agency  with our   branches, Atlasreisen and DER, and also, in the business travel sector with FCm Travel Solutions.

IT-intensive business

Gardner: This is a very IT-intensive business now. Everything in travel is done though networked applications and cloud and software-as-a-service (SaaS) services. So a very intensive IT activity in each of these branches?

Karbginski: That’s right. Without the reservation systems, we can’t do any flight    bookings or reservations or check hotel availability. So without IT,  we   can do nothing.

Gardner: And tell me about the problem you  needed to solve. You had four  generations of PCs.  You couldn’t control them. It  took a lot of time  to recover if there was  a failure, and there was a  lot of different  software that you had to  support.

Karbginski: Yes. We had no domain integration no  control and we had those  crashes,  for example. All the data would be  gone. We had no backups  out there.  And  we changed the desktops about  every four or five  years. For  example, when the reservation system  needed more memory, we  had to buy  the memory, service providers were  going out there, and  everything was  done during business hours.

We now have  nearly about 100 percent virtualization. ... So it's about 99 percent  virtualization. ... So the data is under our control in the data    center, and important company information is not left in an office out    there. Security is a big thing.

Gardner: What were some of the things that you had to do in   order to enable this to work properly?

Karbginski: There   were some challenges during the rollout. The bandwidth was a  big thing.   Our service provider had to work very hard for us, because  we needed   more bandwidth out there. The path we had our offices was 1  or 2-Mbit   links to the headquarters data center. With desktop  virtualization, we   need a little bit more, depending on the number of  the workplaces and we   needed better quality of the lines.

So bandwidth was one thing. We also had the network infrastructure. We found some 10-Mbit half-duplex switches. So we had to change it. And we also had some hardware    problems. We had a special multi-card board for payment to read out    passports or to read out credit card information. They were very old and    connected with PS/2.

Fixed a lot of problems

So    there were a lot of problems, and we fixed them all. We changed the    switches. Our service provider for Internet VPN connection brought us    more quality. And we changed the keyboards. We don’t need this old  stuff   anymore.

Gardner: How has this worked out in  terms of  productivity, energy savings, lowering costs, and even  business  benefits?

Karbginski: Saving was our big thing  in planning  this project. The desktops have  been running out there now  about one  year, and we know that we have up  to 80 percent energy  saving, just from  changing the hardware out  there. We’re running the Wyse P20 Zero Client instead of physical PC hardware.

We needed more energy for the server side in the data center, but if    you look at it, we have 60 up to 70 percent energy savings overall. I    think it’s really great.

Gardner: That’s very good. So   what else comes in terms of productivity?

Karbginski: In the past, the updates came during the business hours. Now, we can   do  all software updates at nights or at the weekends or if the office   is  closed. So helpdesk cost is reduced about 50 percent.

... We're using Dell servers with two sockets, quad-core, 144-gigabyte RAM. We're also using EMC Clariion SAN with 25 terabytes. Network infrastructure is Cisco, based on 10 GB Nexus data center switches. At the beginning the project, we had View 4.0 and we upgraded it last month to 4.6.

The people side

Gardner: What were some of the challenges in terms of working this through the    people side of the process? We've talked about process, we've talked    technology, but was there a learning curve or an education process for    getting other people in your IT department as well as the users to    adjust to this?

Karbginski: There  were some unknown   challenges or some new challenges we had during the  rollout. For   example, the network team. The most important thing was  understanding of   virtualization. It's an enterprise environment now,  and if someone,  for  example, restarts the firewall in the data center, the desktops in our offices were disconnected.

It's really important to inform the other departments and also your own help desk.

...  The first thing that the end users told us was that the selling    platform from Amadeus, the reservation system, runs much faster now.    This was the first thing most of the end users told us, and that’s a    good thing.

The next is that the desktop follows the user. If the    user works in one office now and next week in another office, he gets    the same desktop. If the user is at the headquarters, he can use the    same desktop, same outlook, and same configuration. So desktop follows    the user now. This works really great.

Gardner: Looking to the future, are you going to be doing this following-the-user capability to more devices, perhaps mobile devices or at home PCs?

Karbginski: We plan to implement the security gateway with PCoIP support for home  office users or mobile users who can access their   same company desktop  with all their data on it from nearly every   computer in the world to  bring the user more flexibility.

Gardner: If you were advising  someone on what to learn from  your experience  as they now move toward  desktop virtualization, any  thoughts about  what you would recommend for  them?

Inform other departments

Karbginski: The most important thing is to get in touch with the other  departments   and inform them about the thing you're doing. Also, inform  the user  help  desk directly at the beginning of the project. So take  time to  inform  them what desktop virtualization means and which  processes will  change,  because we know most of our colleagues had a  wrong  understanding of  virtualization.

They think that  with virtualization, everything will change and we'll   need other  support servers, and it's just a new thing and nobody needs   it. If you  inform them what you're doing that nothing will be changed   for them,  because all support processes are the same as before, they   will accept  it and understand the benefits for the company and for the   user.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:

1 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

The next BriefingsDirect case study interview focuses on Southwest Airlines,    one of the best-run companies anywhere, with some 35 straight years  of   profitability, and how  "IT as a service" has been transformative  for  them in terms of productivity.

This story comes as part of a special BriefingsDirect podcast series from a recent VMworld 2011 Conference. The series explores the latest in cloud computing and virtualization infrastructure developments.

Here to share more about how Southwest is innovating and adapting with IT as a compelling strategic differentiator is Bob Young, Vice President of Technology and Chief Technology Officer at Southwest Airlines. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: We have heard a lot about IT as a service. How have you at Southwest been able to  keep IT squarely in the role of enablement?

Young: As we are taking a look and trying to be what travelers want in an    airline, and we are constantly looking for ways to improve Southwest    Airlines and make it better for our customers, that's really where virtualization and IT as a service comes into play.

People want to be able to get on Southwest.com,   make a reservation, log on to their Rapid Rewards or our Loyalty   Program, and they  want to be able to do it when they want to do it, when   they need to  do it, from wherever they are. And it’s just great to be   able to  provide that service.

We provide that to them at any   point in  time that they want in a reliable manner. And that's really   what it  gets right down to -- to make the functions and the solutions   that we  provide ubiquitous so people don’t really need to think about   anything  other than, "I need to do this and I can do it now."

At your fingertips

Gardner: I travel quite a bit and it seems to me that things have changed a lot  in the last few years.   One of the nice things is that information  seems to be at your   fingertips more than ever. I never seem to be out  of the loop now as a   traveler. I can find out changes probably as  quickly as the folks at the   gate.

So how has this transfer of  information been possible?  How  have you been able to keep up with the  demands and the expectations  of  the travelers?

Young: If we talk about information and the  flow of  information through  applications and services, it really starts  to  segment the core  technical aspects of that so the customer and our   employees don’t  really need to think about it. When they want to get  the  flight at the  gates, the passenger is on a flight leg, etc., they  can  go ahead and  get that at any moment in time.

... The same is true   of how we provide IT as a  service. What we want to be able to do is   provide IT whenever they  want it, whenever they need it, at the right   cost point, and to meet  their needs. We've got some of the best   customers in the world and  they like to do things for themselves. We   want to allow them to do  that for themselves and be able to provide our   employees the same.

Gardner: How in  IT have you been able to create common infrastructures,  reduce   redundancy, and then yet still ramp up to meet all your  requirements?

Significant volume

Young: What   we've been able to do and how we have been able to meet some  of those   challenges is through a number of different VMware products.  One of the   core products is VMware itself, if we talk about vSphere, vMotion, etc., to be able to provide that virtualization. You can get a 1-to-10 virtualization depending on which type of servers and blades you're using, which helps us on the infrastructure side of the house   to  maintain that and have the storage, physical, and electrical   capacity  in our data centers.

But it also allows us, as we're moving, consolidating, and expanding these different data centers, to be able to move that virtual machine (VM) seamlessly between points. Then, it doesn’t matter where it’s running.

That    allows us the capacity. So if we have a fare sale and I need to add    capacity on some of our services, it gives our us and our team that run    the infrastructure the ability to bring up new services on new VMs    seamlessly. It plugs right into how we're doing things, so that internal    cloud allows us not to experience blips.

It's been a great add for us from a capacity management perspective and being able to get the right capacity, with the right    applications, at the right time. It allows us to manage that in such a    way that it’s transparent to our end-users so they don’t notice any  of   this is going on in the background, and the experience is not  different.

...  We started our virtualized   environments about 18 months ago. We went  from a very small amount of   virtualization to what we coined our  Server 2.0 strategy, which was   really the combination of  commodity-based hardware blades with VMware on   that.

And that  allowed us last year in the first and second   quarter to grow from  several hundred VMs to over several thousand, which   is where we're at  today in the production environment. If you talk   about production,  development, and test, production is just one of those   environments.

It  has allowed us to scale that very rapidly   without having to add a  thousand physical servers. And it has been a   tremendous benefit for us  in managing our power, space, and cooling in   the data center,    along with allowing our engineers who are doing the day-to-day work  to   have a single way to manage it, deploy, and move stuff around even   more  automatically. They don’t have to mess with that anymore, VMware   just  takes care of the different products that are part of the VMware   Suite.

Gardner: And your  confidence, has it risen to the  level where you're looking at  70, 80,  90, even more percent of  virtualization? How do you expect to  end that  journey?

Ready for the evolution

Young: I would love to be at 100 percent virtualized. That would be   fantastic.  I think unfortunately we still have some manufacturers and   software  vendors -- and we call them vendors, because typically we   don’t say  partners -- who decide they are not going to support their   software  running in the virtualized environment. That can create   problems,  especially when you need to keep some of those systems up 24 x   7, 365,  with 99.95 percent availability.

We're hoping that    changes, but the goal would be to move as much as we can, because if I    take a look at virtualization, we are kind of our internal private    cloud. What that’s really doing is getting us ready for the evolution    that’s going to happen over the next, 5, 7, or 10 years, where you may    have applications and data deployed out in a cloud, a virtual private cloud, public cloud if the security becomes good enough, where you've got to bring all that stuff together.

If you need to have huge amounts of capacity and two applications are not co-located that need to talk back and forth, you've got to be much more  efficient   on the calls and the communications and make that seamless  for the   customer.

This is giving us the platform to start  learning more   and start developing those solutions that don’t need to  be collocated in   a data center or in one or two data centers, but can  really be pushed   wherever it makes sense. That could be from wherever  the most efficient   data center is from a green technology perspective,  use the least   electricity and cooling power, to alternate energy, to  what makes sense   at the time of the year.

That is a huge add  and a huge win for  us  in the IT community to be able to start  utilizing some of that   virtualization and even across physical  locations.

Gardner: Is there a   centralization feature to this that also is paying dividends?

Young: That’s a huge cornerstone of the suite of tools that we've been able   to  get through VMware is being able to deploy custom solutions and  even   some of the off-the-shelf solutions on a standard platform,  standard   operating systems, standard configurations, standard  containers for the   web, etc. It allows us to deploy that stuff within  minutes, whereas it   used to take engineers manually going to configure  each thing   separately. That’s been a huge savings.

The other  thing is, once   you get the configuration right and you have it  automated, you don’t   have to worry about people taking some human  missteps. Those are going   to happen, and you've got to go back and  redo something. That   elimination of error and the speed at which we  can do that is helping.   As you expand your server footprints and the  number of VMs and servers   you have without having to add to your  staff, you can actually do more   with the same number of or fewer  staff.

Gardner: How you feel about desktop virtualization?

Young: What’s really driven us to take a look  at  it is that around our  environment we can control security on virtual   desktops, etc., very  clearly, very quickly and deliver that in a great   service.

New mobile devices

The    other thing that’s leading to this is, not just what we talked about   in  security, is the plethora of brand new mobile devices -- iPhones, iPads, Android devices, Galaxy. HP has a new device. RIM has a new device. We need to be able to deliver our services in a  more   ubiquitous manner. The virtual desktop allows us to go ahead and   deliver  some of those where I don’t need to control the hardware. I   just  control the interface, which can protect our systems virtually,   and it’s  really pretty neat.

I was on one of my devices the   other day and  was able to go in via virtual desktop that was set up to   be able to use  some of the core systems without having all that stuff   loaded on my  machine, and that was via the Internet. So it worked out   phenomenally  well.

Now, there are some issues that you have to   do depending on  whether you're doing collocation and facility, but you   can easily get  through some of that with the right virtualization  setup  and networking.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:

1 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

Educators are using of desktop virtualization in innovative new ways to enable "bring your own device" (BYOD) benefits for faculty and students. This latest BriefingsDirect  interview explores how one IT organization has made the leap to allowing  young users to choose their own client devices to gain access to all the work or learning applications and  data  they need -- safely, securely, and with high performance.

The nice thing about BYOD is that you can essentially extend what do you do on-premises or on a local area network (LAN) -- like a school campus -- to anywhere; to your home; to your travels, 24×7.

The Avon Community School Corp. in Avon, Indiana has been experimenting with BYOD and desktop    virtualization, and has recently embarked in a wider deployment for both  this school year.

To get their story, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions, interviewed Jason Brames, Assistant Director of Technology, and Jason Lantz, Network Services Team Leader, both at Avon Community School. [Disclosure:  VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: You've been successful with server virtualization, but what made it important for you now to   extend virtualization to the desktop?

Brames: One of the things that is important to our district we noticed when doing an assessment   of our infrastructure:  We have aging endpoints. We had a need to  extend  the refresh rate of  our desktop computers from what was typical  -- for a  lot of school  districts typical is about a 5-year refresh rate  -- to  getting  anywhere from 7 to 10, maybe even 12 years, out of a desktop computer.

By going to a thin client model and connecting those machines to a virtual desktop, we're able   to  achieve high quality results for our end users, while still giving   them  computing power that they need and allowing us to have the cost   savings  by negating the need to purchase new equipment every five   years.

By going with   virtual environment, the problem that we  were looking to solve was   really just that -- how do we provide  extended refresh rate for all of our devices?

Supporting 5,500 computers

We're  located about 12 miles west of Indianapolis, Indiana, and we have 13  instructional   buildings. We're a pre-K-to-12 institution and we have  approximately   8,700 students, nearing 10,000 end-users in total. We’re  currently   supporting about 5,500 computers in our district.

...  Currently  have  400 View desktop licenses. We’re seeing utilization of  that  license pool  of 20-25 percent right now, and the primary reason  that  we’re seeing  that utilization is because we’re really just  beginning  that phase, with  this being our first year for our virtual  desktop roll  out. We’re  really in the second year, but the first year  of more  widespread use.

We’re  training teachers on how to  adequately and  effectively use this  technology in their classroom with  kids It's been  very highly received  and is being adopted very well in  our classrooms,  because people are  seeing that we were able to  improve the computing  experience for them.

Lantz: With that many devices, getting out there and installing software, even  if it’s a push, locally, or what have you, there's a big management  overhead there. By using VMware View and having that in our data center,    where we can control that, the ability to have your golden image that    you can then push out to a number of devices has made it a lot easier   to  transition to this type of model.

We’re finding that we can   get  applications out quicker with more quality control, as far as   knowing  exactly what’s going to happen inside of the virtual machine (VM) when you run that application. So that’s been a big help.

A lot of our  applications are Web-based, Education City.  It’s a lot of  graphics and video. And we found that  we're still able  to run those in  our View environment and not have  issues.

Gardner: What are you  running in terms of servers? What is  your desktop  virtualization  platform, and what is it that allows you to  move on  this so far?

Lantz: On the server side, we're running VMware vSphere 4.1.  On the desktop side, we're running View 4.6.   Currently in our server  production, as we call it, we have three   servers. And we're adding a  fourth shortly. On the View side of things,   we currently have two  servers and we’re getting two more in the next   month or so. So we’ll  have a total of four.

Access from anywhere

Gardner: Now one of the nice things about the desktop virtualization and this    BYOD is it allows people to access these activities more freely    anywhere. How do you manage to take  what was once confined to the  school network and allow the  students and  other folks in your  community to do what they need to do,  regardless of  where they are,  regardless of the device?

Brames: We’re a  fairly affluent community. We have kids who were requesting to   bring in  their own devices. We felt as though encouraging that model   in our  district was something that would help students continue to use    computers that were familiar to them and help us realize some cost    savings long term.

So by connecting to virtual desktops in our    environment, they get a familiar resource while they're within our walls    in the school district, have access to all of their shared drives,    network drives, network applications, all of the typical resources that    are an expectation of sitting down in front of a school-owned piece of    equipment. And they're seeing the availability of all of those things   on  their own device.

... A typical   classroom for us contains  four student computing stations, as well as,   depending upon the  building size, three to five labs available. We’re   not focusing our  desktop virtualization on those labs. We’re focusing on   the classroom  computing stations right now. Potentially, we'll also be   in labs, as  we go into the future.

Then, in addition to those   student  computing stations, we’re seeing those applications where our    administrative team or principals and our district-level administrators    are able to begin using virtual desktops to access while they’re   outside  of the district and growing familiar with that, so that   whenever we  enter into that phase where we’re allowing our students to   access from  outside of our network, we have that support structure in   place.

... We’re also seeing an influx of more mobile-type devices such as tablets and even smartphones and things like that. The percentage of our users that are using    tablets and smartphones right now for powerful computing or their    primary devices is fairly low. However, we anticipate over time that the    variety of devices we’ll have connecting to our network because of    virtual desktops is going to increase.

Gardner: How is that hand-off  happening? Are you able to provide a unified experience  yet?

Lantz: That’s part of phase two of our approach that  we’re implementing  right  now. We’ve gotten it out into the classrooms to  get the students   familiar with it, so that they understand how to use  it. The next  step  in that process is to allow them to use this at home.

We    currently have administrators that are using it in this fashion. They    have tablets and are using the View client they connect in and get the    same experience if they're in school or out of school.

So we’re    to that point. Now that our administrators understand the benefits,  now   that our teachers have seen it in the classrooms, it’s a matter of    getting it out there to the community.

One of the other ways  that   we’re making it available is that at our public library, we have a  set   of machines that students can access as well, because as you  know, not   every student has access to high-speed Internet, but they  are able to  go  to library, check out these machines, and be able to  get into the   network that way. Those are some of the ways that we’re  trying to bridge   that gap.

Huge win-win

Technology Integration Group has resources that allow us to see what other school districts are    doing and what are some of the things that they’ve run into. Then, they    bring back here and we can discuss how we want to roll it out in our    environment. They’ve been very good at giving us ideas of what has    worked with other organizations and what hasn’t. That’s where they've    come in. They’ve really helped us understand how we can best use this in    our environment.

Gardner: I  often hear from   organizations, when they move to desktop  virtualization, that there are   some impacts on things like network or  storage that they didn’t fully   anticipate. How has that worked for  you? How has this roll out movement   towards increased desktop  virtualization impacted you in terms of what   you needed to do with  your overall infrastructure?

Lantz: Luckily for us we’ve had a lot of growth in the last two to three   years,  which has allowed us to get some newer equipment. So our network    infrastructure is very sound. We didn’t run into a lot of the issues    that commonly you would with network bandwidth and things like that.

On the storage side, we did increase our storage. We went with an EqualLogic box for that, but with View, it doesn’t take up a ton of storage  space   with link clones and things like that. So having seen a huge  impact   there, now as we get further into this, storage requirements  will get   greater, but currently that hasn’t been a big issue for us.

Gardner: On the flip-side of that, a lot of organizations I talk to, who moved    to desktop virtualization, gained some benefits on things like  backup,   disaster recovery, security, and control over data and assets,  and even   into compliance and regulatory issues. Has there been an  upside that  you  could point to in terms of being a more centralized  control of the   desktop content and assets?

Difficult to monitor

Lantz: When you start talking about students bringing in their own devices,    it's difficult to monitor what's on that personally owned device.

We   found that  by giving them a View desktop, we know what's in our   environment and we  know what that virtual machine has. That allows us   to have more secure  access for those students without compromising   what's on that student’s  machine, or what you may not know about what's   on that student’s  machine. That’s been a big benefit for us allowing   students to bring in  their own devices.

Gardner: Do we have any metrics of success either in business or, in this  case,   learning terms and/or IT cost savings? What has this done for  you? I   know it's a little early, but what's the early results?

Brames: You did mention that it is a little bit early, but we believe that as    we begin using virtual desktops more so in our environment, one of  the   major cost savings that we’re going to see as a result is  licensing  cost  for unique learning applications.

Typically in our district we would have purchased x    number of licenses for each one of our instructional buildings  because   they needed to utilize that with students in the classroom.  They may   have a certain number of students that need access to this  application,   for example, but they're not all accessing it during the  same time of   the day or it's on a machine that’s on a fat client, a  physical machine   somewhere in the building, and it's difficult for  students to have   access to it.

By creating these pools of  machines that have   specialty software on them we’re able to  significantly reduce the number   of titles we need to license for  certain learning applications or   certain applications that improve  efficiencies for teachers and for   students.

So that’s one area  in which we know we’re going to see   significant return on our  investment. We already talked about extending   the endpoints, and with  energy savings, I think we can prove some   results there as well.  Anything to add, Jason?

Lantz: One    of the ones that’s hard to calculate is, as you mentioned, maintenance    or management of this piece and technology, as we all know you’re  doing   more with less. This really gives you the ability to do that.  How you   measure that is sometimes difficult, but there are definitely  cost   savings there as well.

Gardner: I know budgets are really important in just about any school    environment. Do you have any   sense of the delta there between what it  would be if you stuck to   traditional cost structures, traditional  licensing, fat client, to get   to that one to one ratio, compared to  what you’re going to be able to do   over time with this virtualized  approach?

Brames: Our Advanced    Learning Center is the school building that has primarily senior    students and advanced placement students. There are about 600 students    that attend there.

Last year, 75 percent of those students were    using school-owned equipment and 25 percent of them were bringing  their   own laptops to school. This year, what we have seen is that 43  percent   of our students are beginning to bring their own devices to  connect to   our network and have access to network resources.

If  that trend   continues, which we think it will, we’ll be looking at  certainly over  50  percent next year, hopefully approaching 60-65  percent of our  students  bringing their own devices. When you consider  that that is  approximately  400 devices that the school district did  not need to  invest in, that’s a  significant saving for us.

Gardner: If you could do this over   again, a little bit of 20/20 hindsight,  what might you want to tell others   in terms of being prepared?

Lantz: One thing that’s   important is that when you explain this to users,  the words "virtual   desktop" can be a little confusing to teachers and  your end-users. What   I've done is taken the approach of it’s no  different than having a   regular machine and you can set it up to where  it looks exactly the   same.

No real difference

When    you start talking with end users about virtual, it gets into, okay,   "So  it’s running back here, but what problems am I going to encounter?"   and  those sort of things. Trying to get that end user to realize that   there  really isn’t a difference between a virtual desktop and a real   desktop  has been important for us for getting them on board and making   them  understand that it’s not going to be a huge change for them.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:

1 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

Our next VMware case study interview focuses on the City of Fairfield, California, and how the IT organization there has leveraged virtualization and cloud-delivered applications to provide new levels of service in an increasingly efficient manner.

We’ll    see how Fairfield, a mid-sized city of 110,000 in Northern  California,   has taken the do-more-with-less adage to its fullest,  beginning   interestingly with core and mission-critical city services  applications.

This story comes as part of a special BriefingsDirect podcast series from the VMworld 2011 Conference. The series explores the latest in cloud computing and virtualization infrastructure developments.

Here to share more detail on how virtualization is making the public sector more responsive at lower costs is Eudora Sindicic, Senior IT Analyst Over Operations in Fairfield. The discussion is moderated by  Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Why virtualize mission-critical applications, things like police and fire support, first?

Sindicic: First of all, it’s always been challenging in disaster recovery and business continuity. Keeping those things in mind, our CAD/RMS systems for the police center and also our fire staffing   system were  high on the list for protecting. Those are Tier 1   applications that we  want to be able to recover very quickly.

We thought the best way to do that was to virtualize them and set us up for future business continuity and true failover and disaster recovery.

So    I put it to my CIO, and he okayed it. We went forward with VMware,    because we saw they had the best, most robust, and mature applications    to support us. Seeing that our back-end was SQL for those two systems, and seeing that we were just going to embark  on  a  brand-new upgrading of our CAD/RMS system, this was a prime time  to   jump on the bandwagon and do it.

Also, with our back-end storage being NetApp, and NetApp having such an intimate relationship with VMware, we decided to go with VMware.

Gardner: So you were able to accomplish your virtualization and also gain that disaster recovery and business continuity benefit, but you pointed out  the time was of the essence. How long did  it take you?.

Sindicic: Back in early fiscal year 2010, I started doing all the research. I    probably did a good nine months of research before even bringing this    option to my CIO. Once I brought the option up, I worked with my    vendors, VMware and NetApp, to obtain best pricing for the solution that    I wanted.

I started implementation in October and completed  the   process in March. So it took some time. Then we went live with our    CAD/RMS system on May 10, and it has been very robust and running    beautifully ever since.

Gardner: Tell me about your IT operations.

Sindicic: I have our finance system, an Oracle-based system, which consists of an Oracle database server and Apache applications server, and another reporting server that runs on a    different platform. Those will all be virtual OSs sitting in one of my    two clusters.

For the police systems, I have a separate cluster    just for police and fire. Then, in the regular day-to-day business,  like   finance and other applications that the city uses, I have a  campus   cluster to keep those things separated and to also relieve any  downtime   of maintenance. So everything doesn’t have to be affected if  I'm moving   virtual servers among systems and patching and doing  updates.

Other applications

We’re also going to be virtualizing several other applications, such as a citizen complaint application called Coplogic. We're going to be putting that in as well into the PD cluster.

The version of VMware that we’re using is 4.1, we’re using ESXi server. On the PD cluster, I have two ESXi servers and on my campus, I have three. I'm using vSphere 4, and it’s been really wonderful having a good handle on that control.

Also, within my vSphere, vCenter server,    I've installed a bunch of NetApp storage control solutions that allow    me to have centralized control over one level snapshotting and    replication. So I can control it all from there. Then vSphere gives me    that beautiful centralized view of all my VMs and resources being consumed.

It’s    been really wonderful to be able to have that level of view into my    infrastructure, whereas when the things were distributed, I hadn’t had    that view that I needed. I’d have to connect one by one to each one of    my systems to get that level.

Also, there are some things that we’ve learned during this whole thing. I went from two VLANs to four VLANs. When looking at your traffic and the type of traffic    that’s going to traverse the VLANs, you want segregate that out big  time   and you’ll see a huge increase in your performance.

The other thing is making sure that you have the correct type of drives in your storage. I knew that right off the bat that IOPS was going to be an issue and then, of course, connectivity. We’re using  Brocade switches to connect to the backend fiber channel drives for the  server VMs, and for lower-end storage, we’re using iSCSI.

Gardner: And how has the virtualization efforts within all of that worked out?

Sindicic: It’s been wonderful. We’ve had wonderful disaster recovery capabilities. We have snapshotting abilities. I'm snapshotting the primary database server and application server,    which allows for snapshots up to three weeks in primary storage and   six  months on secondary storage, which is really nice, and it has   served us  well.

We already had a fire drill, where one report   was  accidentally deleted out of a database due to someone doing   something --  and I'll leave it at that. Within 10 minutes, I was able   to bring up  the snapshot of the records management system of that   database.

The  user was able to go into the test database,   retrieve his document, and  then he was able to print it. I was able to   export that document and  then re-import it into the production system.   So there was no downtime.  It literally took 10 minutes, and everybody   was happy.

... We   are seeing cost benefits now. I don’t have  all the metrics, but we’ve   spun up six additional VMs. If you figure  out the cost of the Dells,    because we are a Dell shop, it would cost anywhere between $5,000 and    $11,000 per server. On top of that, you're talking about the cost of   the  Microsoft Software Assurance for that operating system. That has saved a lot of money right there   in  some of the projects that we’re currently embarking on, and for the    future.

We have several more systems that I know are going to  be   coming online and we're going to save in cost. We’re going to save  in   power. Power consumption, I'm projecting, will slowly go down over  time   as we add to our VM environment.

As it grows and it becomes more robust, and it will, I'm looking forward to a large cost savings over a 5- to 10-year period.

Better insight

Gardner: Was there anything that surprised you that you didn’t expect, when  you moved from the physical to the virtualized environment?

Sindicic: I was pleasantly surprised with the depth of reporting  that  I could  physically see, the graph, the actual metrics, as we were   ongoing. As  our CAD system came online into production, I could  actually  see  utilization go up and to what level.

I was  also pleasantly   surprised to be able to see to see when the backups would  occur, how it   would affect the system and the users that were on it.  Because of  that,  we were able to time them so that would be the  least-used hours  and what  those hours were. I could actually tell in  the system when it  was the  least used.

It was real time and it  was just really  wonderful to  be able to easily do that, without having  to manually  create all the  different tracking ends that you have to do  within Microsoft Monitor or anything like that. I could do that completely independently of the OS.

Gardner: We're hearing a lot here at VMworld about  desktop virtualization as well. I don’t know whether you’ve looked at  that, but it seems  like  you've set yourself up for moving in that  direction. Any thoughts   about mobile or virtualized desktops as a future  direction for you?

On the horizon

Sindicic: I see that most definitely on the horizon. Right now, the only thing    that's hindering us is cost and storage. But as storage goes down, and    as more robust technologies come out around storage, such as solid  state, and as the price comes down on that, I foresee that something  definitely coming into our environment.

Even here at the conference I'm taking a bunch of VDI and VMware View sessions, and I'm looking forward to hopefully starting a new project with virtualizing at the desktop level.

This    will give us much more granular control over not only what’s on the    user’s desktop, but patch management and malware and virus protection,    instead of at the PC level doing it the host level, which would be    wonderful. It would give us really great control and hopefully decreased    cost. We’d be using a different product than probably what we’re  using   right now.

If you're actually using virus protection at  the  host  level, you’re going to get a lot of bang for your buck and  you  won't  have any impact on the PC-over-IP. That’s probably the way we we'll go, with PC-over-IP.

Right    now, storage, VLANing all that has to happen, before we can even   embark  on something like that. So there's still a lot of research on my   part  going on, as well as finding a way to mitigate costs, maybe   trade-in,  something to gain something else. There are things that you   can do to  help make something like this happen.

... In city government, our IT  infrastructure   continues to grow as people are laid off and  departments want to   automate more and more processes, which is the  right way to go. The IT   staff remains the same, but the  infrastructure, the data, and the   support continues to grow. So I'm  trying to implement infrastructure   that grows smarter, so we don’t  have to work harder, but work smarter,  so that we can do a lot more with less.

VMware   sure does allow  that with centralized control in management, with   being able to  dynamically update virtual desktops, virtual servers, and   the patch  management and automation of that. You can take it to   whatever level of  automation you want or a little in between, so that   you can do a little  bit of check and balances with your own eyes,   before the system goes off  and does something itself.

Also, with   the high availability and  fault tolerance that VMware allows, it's   been invaluable. If one of my  systems goes down, my VMs automatically   will be migrated over, which is a  wonderful thing. We’re looking to   implement as much virtualization as  we can as budget will allow.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Learn more. Sponsor: Capgemini.

Social media and the increased role that  linked communities of users have on issues, discourse, and public opinion are  changing the world in many ways -- from how societies react such as in the  Middle East turmoil to how users flock to or avoid certain products and services.

The    fact is that many people are now connected in new ways and they’re    voicing opinions and influencing their peers perhaps more than ever    before. Businesses cannot afford to simply ignore these global -- and   what  now appeared to be long-term -- social media trends.

The latest BriefingsDirect discussion then focuses on the impact that social media is having on enterprises.  We specifically examine with an executive at Capgemini on what steps businesses can take to manage  social media as a market opportunity, rather than react to it as a  hard-to-fathom threat. Hear too how services are being developed to  help businesses to better understand and exploit the potential of  social  media.

The discussion with Paul Cole, Vice President of Customer Operations Management and Business Process Outsourcing at Capgemini, is the first in the series of podcasts  with  Capgemini on social media issues and business process outsourcing. The interview is conducted by Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: Capgemini is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: It seems a bit of a twisted logic when we say that social media  can be both a threat and an opportunity. How could social media be both?

Cole: It's all in how you decide to respond. Social media, in and of itself, is a neutral topic. It could be viewed as a utensil or a platform,    upon which you can do things. And depending on your intent, whether    you’re an enterprise or a customer, those activities could be viewed    favorably or negatively. And that's true as much in the sociopolitical    world as in business.

The important thing is that social media  is   the platform, not the action itself, and it’s really what you  decide  to  do over that platform that makes the difference in business  and in  the  world at large.

Gardner: Do you have  any evidence, research, or findings of any sort that  bolster this  notion that social media is a sea change and not just a blip?

Game changer

Cole: Well, based on a survey we commissioned last winter, somewhat surprisingly, a bit more than one  in 10 executives did characterize it as a fad relative to the business  world.

However,   you can look at it in the everyday world around  us and the media as it   relates to impact on society and in the  sociopolitical spectrum, and   there's very little doubt that it’s  changing the game there. I believe   it will have an equally profound  impact on business over time.

Social  media has become the bullhorn of the 21st century. It allows people to  spread their message, to   amplify that message, to mobilize the  community, and also to monitor in   real time the events as they unfold.

We  are having to deal  with  it across the political, social, and cultural spectrums. Witness,   unfortunately, the emergence of something that we’re  now calling flash mobs, a case where the platform is being misapplied  toward organizing a community of people who have damaging intentions.

So    back to your question on threat or opportunity, significant or    insignificant impact, it’s all based on the intent and actions of the    individuals utilizing the utensil.

Gardner: On one  hand, we seem to see a lack   of control or at least different aspects  to how people behave. We  don’t  have the necessary tools. But on the  other hand, we're seeing a  lot  more information generated, and  information often is the lifeblood  of  how organizations react and  adjust to markets.

Cole: Information overload is one potential consequence of this. It’s all a matter of how you   take  that information and translate it into actionable insights,   against  which you can make some smarter business decisions, and from   our  perspective, ultimately deliver a better customer experience which   will  help you grow.

What’s neat about what’s happening in the   world of  technology, on top of the social environment, is that there is   a whole  new generation of tools emerging that allow you to develop   that  insight.

There are four steps that a company can go through   to  generate social intelligence. First, is listening to what is going   on  out there. There has not been an earpiece for us to really take  the   pulse of the market, and what's happening in the virtual world or  the   internet world until the recent development of some of these  social   listening tools. So the ability just to know what's going on,  who is   saying what, who are the influencers, what are their sentiments is an  important first step.

Monitoring change

The    second step is the ability to monitor that over time and see how    attitudes, perceptions, and most importantly, behaviors are changing and    what are the impact and implication of that for your business, either    from a marketing or a selling or customer service standpoint. In    addition to monitoring that, you’re also now able, with text analytics    tools to not simply track and describe what happening, but also isolate    cause and effect.

So if I'm launching a Twitter campaign, putting a new product out there, running a contest, or    engaging in some kind of social care activity, what is the impact it's    having in terms of the customer’s behavior and what adjustments can I    make to be more successful?

It's being able to get attribution    and get to a root cause by applying these analytic tools. So you've    listened, monitored, and analyzed. The killer app,    if you will, is the last step of closing loop in terms of your  ability   to respond. So many companies today are putting their toe in  the water   in the social world by listening with these tools and trying  to   understand what's being said. It's new enough where not that many  have   actually industrialized their process for responding.

Ultimately,    your ability to now go back into that community and influence the    customer or attempt to influence the customer and their behavior is    where there is a tremendous upside for companies in terms of generating    higher growth and profit.

Gardner: How is Capgemini working toward some solutions on this?

Cole: As   a global provider of consulting technology and outsourcing  services,   Capgemini attempts to keep its finger on the pulse of  market. You have   to be blind and deaf to not recognize that social  media has quickly   emerged on the scene. The question then becomes, as a  provider of   services, how to translate that into sets of offerings  that add value   for our clients.

At one level, you could look at  social media as a wave or a  phenomenon.  I’ve been in the professional  services, technology services  business  for 30 years, and we’ve seen  the waves come and go, whether  that would  be CRM or ERP through SAP or eCommerce, which I think this mirrors quite a bit, and Y2K. So there's always an emerging area that people will try to understand, chase, and then capitalize on.

My particular area of expertise is around  customer management.   So I look through the lens of how a company  acquires, develops, and   retains its customers and how can we manage some  of that process for   them in a faster, better, or cheaper manner. We do  that today in   traditional forms with managing their call centers or  their customer   service operations, helping them present stronger web  content,   providing them with insights through analytical services, and  so forth.

What   social media started to suggest to us was that  there was a new   opportunity to bring another service to the market that  allowed clients   to focus on the business problem that they’re trying to solve  and   provided us the opportunity to provide them with everything they  needed   to mobilize around that objective in the social world.

Marketing enhancement

In  and of itself, social media is not going to drive your business    forward. As we've discussed, it's really a platform or a utility upon    which you can engage customers for one or more activities based on a    business objective. It does, at the end of the day, relate back to what    you're trying to accomplish.

When I went to school, we were  trained on the four Ps in marketing.   You develop a product that the  marketplace is interested in. You  price  that product at a level that the  consumer or customer perceives  value  so they want to transact with you.  You need to promote that in  terms of  distinguishing you against your  competitors and bring that  product to  market with some form of  distribution. We call that the four Ps.

Obviously    you still need to do all those things, but in the social world now,    there is a new twist. If you think about the product, we used to take a    very linear approach to doing market research, testing concepts, via    surveys and focus groups. In today’s social world, you can do that  much   more dynamically. There's a whole phenomenon around crowd  sourcing with   which you can solicit people's input and feedback and  iterate on that   massively, and closer to real time.

Your    ability to get really close to the marketplace is enhanced   tremendously  by social media. In terms of promoting, it used to be   broadcast media,  but now you're able to do micro campaigns. You can do   tweet campaigns.  You can do campaigns through Facebook. Your ability  to  target the  individual that you are trying to influence has gone up   exponentially.

We've  always talked about the segment of one,  but  it was very difficult to  do. Now, you can get in there and really   understand who is driving  popular opinion, who are the big  influencers,  who do you need to convert  to be an enthusiast or an  advocate of your  product, and launch very  specific campaigns against  them. It's a  different form of promotion.

It's  the same thing  with pricing  and distribution. While you still need to  do many of the  same  activities, the way in which you will execute on  those activities  has  evolved and become much more dynamic.

Every function  within the organization has a potential application in   the social  world. I don't think it's the kind of thing that any one   executive or  any one function is going to own per se.

It's a   matter of  looking at it through the lens of the process that you're   responsible  for, and trying to understand how to apply new thinking and   activities  to improve your efficiency or your effectiveness of that   area. That  could be public relations and the brand, marketing and   developing  effective positioning, product development and management,   selling  through more targeted campaigns or, at the end of the value   chain, a  better servicing of the customer to generate greater loyalty.

Different ways

Gardner: Are we going to repeat history and have a fragmented   approach to this or is there a better way?

Cole: You’ve  really put your finger on a core issue. It all depends.   What is social  media? That depends on who you are and what you're   trying to accomplish.  That’s going to be variable based on your area of   responsibility within  the enterprise.

There is something to be   said for  standardization and taking a platform-based approach to  avoid  the  recurring tendency of investing in your own individual  solutions  and  then lacking interoperability or having to face  integration issues  and  so forth.

While    the application of what you do on top of the social platforms may   vary,  there is potential for the organization to operate as an   enterprise on  top of a single instance of a platform. That’s part of   why we got into  offering a managed service.

We allow the client   to focus on what  they are trying to do in the marketing, selling or   customer service  world. We provide them with the infrastructure, the   technology, the  process discipline, the data, and importantly, the   social media  advocates, the human intelligence layer that is ultimately   conducting  the monitoring and the analytics and the interpretation of   what’s  happening there.

By buying into a managed service the company can avoid having to make capital investments in the    technology, avoid the potential risk of different groups going off and    doing their own thing. They can remain current, because they don’t have    to pay attention to this fast paced dynamic technology market and  what   is the state of the art. That would be our responsibility.

Hopefully,    it's the best of both worlds. They can each, as user communities,    decide what they want to get out of social media, but be able to    leverage the fact that they're all investing in a common platform. ...  It is a different way  of  storing, distributing, and accessing the  data.

What it translates  into  for us is the ability to provide  process as a service. That’s a   fundamental shift in the marketplace  that’s occurring as a result of the   development of cloud capabilities.

Organizations  can just tap   into a service, and that makes it easier for them to get  into a new   area. It’s faster, it’s less expensive. We're trying to  apply that same   concept to social media. We can provide a faster,  better, and/or  cheaper  approach. The client buys the process as a  service on a  subscription  model.

We assure the integrity and  security of the  data. We  provide the data management, the repository,  the  infrastructure, and the  toolset. You're buying a service around a   process, whether that be  listening to your customers, wanting to  launch  marketing campaigns,  providing social care or whatever.

The whole SaaS cloud phenomenon is  just   changing the distribution model and also facilitating an easier    approach for companies to get up and running in this area.

Gardner: How are organizations getting started?

Cole: As evidence of the fact that it is a new phenomenon, you can just    notice the volume of conferences that are out there with social media in    the title. It just reinforces that companies are trying to understand    still what "good" looks like. They’re out there looking for best    practices. They are still paying for "PowerPoint,"    for consultants to come in and help them understand the strategy, the    power of social, what that translates into in terms of metrics and    governance, and so forth.

The market is very much in its    exploratory stage. I'm not sure you can over-architect what social media    means to you at the moment. This is something that you have to get in    and dip your toe in the water. Instead of "ready, aim, fire," it's    probably "fire, fire, aim, ready, fire." This means that you need to    iterate.

You don’t know what you don’t know….. until you get in    to the market and you start to listen to what is happening out there,    identify who the key influencers are, where they're talking about, who    are the advocates for the brand, and who are the potential saboteurs  who   can represent a threat? What are some of the kinds of programs and    activities that one can run?

Rather than the grand strategies,    the big-bang approach, this particular area is deserving of more    experimentation, and iteration. Then, over time, we need the development    of a broader strategy. But, you need to get in there, and listen, and    learn, and act, and from that you'll figure out what works and what    doesn’t work.

Part of what we’re trying to offer our  clients is the ability   to do that faster than doing it themselves,  where they have to go out,   acquire the tools, hire the people, and put  in place the processes.

In   this case, they can say we want to  launch a campaign and we’d like to   understand how we can use the  social world to solve customer service   problems or whatever. We  provide all the tools and capabilities to do   that. They focus on  learning and evolving their strategy of what to do   in the social  world.

... As part of that, in our Social Media Management Solution,  we’ve built a joint solution with a company called Attensity,   which  really comes at the market initially from the text analytics   world, but  offers a nice suite of applications that enable your ability   to listen,  monitor, analyze what's being done, and then respond to  the  customer in  terms of workflow and direct customer engagement. So  it's  what you  decide to do, but it's also having the right toolset  with  which to do  it.

Gardner: Are  there any places to which we  could direct  our listeners and readers  for additional information,  perhaps  whitepapers, other research, and/or more information on your services?

Cole: Certainly capgemini.com. We do have a featured social media section on the website. We've recently published a whitepaper called "Harvesting the Fruit from the Social Media Grapevine".    We hope that clients will find that insightful. It's a bit of a    point-of-view on where the market is today and where it's headed.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Learn more. Sponsor: Capgemini.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

Our   next VMworld case study interview takes the pulse of CharterCARE Health Partners, and examines how virtualized desktops and thin clients are helping with digital records management and healthcare industry compliance and privacy requirements.

We    learn how Rhode Island-based CharterCARE has embraced private cloud   and  virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) to support its distributed,    579-bed community-based health system. The organization operates   the  Roger Williams Medical Center, Our Lady of Fatima Hospital, and    several other caregiver facilities.

We'll hear how the tag team of   private cloud and VDI has provided better data management, security,  reliability, and regulatory auditing capabilities. The successful  infrastructure modernization effort has also helped CharterCARE move to   electronic health records and has helped improve their processes for  clinicians.

This story comes as part of a special BriefingsDirect podcast series from the recent VMworld 2011 Conference. The series explores the latest in cloud computing and virtualization infrastructure developments.

Here to dig into more detail on the CharterCARE IT  infrastructure improvement story is Andy Fuss, Director of Technology  and Engineering at CharterCARE Health Partners. The discussion is moderated by  Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: I'm interested why data management has been a primary driver for you as you've looked to adopt both the private cloud and VDI. What is it about the data equation that’s made this look like a good solution for you?

Fuss: We need our data to be accessible everywhere, at every time, no  matter   what provider is at what facility. Even from an engineering and    technology standpoint, no matter what system analyst, what network    engineer may sit down wherever they are to troubleshoot an issue, we need that common set of tools.

Common repository

We need the common repository of information for a caregiver. That would be the electronic medical information. It could be the x-rays, the slides, the CT scans,    or the results that were dictated by a radiologist. Whatever it might    be, that information needs to be available in a flexible manner and    delivered directly to the deskside experience.

Now, if that’s a desktop, it needs to be on a regular PC, but if we're talking about a tablet, we need to accommodate the tablets that people bring in and have come into the facility and are now actively being used, or zero client technology.

We    have all the different technologies and pieces. We're trying to   promote  these pieces to be used and trying to be flexible with   accommodating  them and getting people to the information that they need   so they can  take care of the first priority, which really is patient   care.

Gardner: Tell me about the extent of your  distributed campus and environment.   Not only are you dealing with many  different types of data and many   different endpoints, but you're also  distributing this across a   multitude of different environments.

Fuss: We have two main acute hospitals.   We have a nursing home, a cancer  center, outpatient care offices, and   several different offices all  around the community. So the data truly   needs to not be resident in  one spot.

Where    you're accessing that data from or where you're using it is  seamless    to the end user and provides a solid customer experience.



We also needed to have a secured disaster recovery (DR) facility, so that if anything were to happen to our primary data center that’s on one of the campuses, we could flex seamlessly over.

So    building a cloud for us made total sense. That cloud hovers between   one  of two data centers. One is at one of the acute facilities, and   then  100 miles away in another state, we have another data center. Our   cloud  roams between the two, and we have data flowing from each area.

So    the connection really is no longer about where it’s physically  located   by any restriction. It’s more of just gaining access to the  internet  and  being able to make connections. Where you're accessing  that data  from  or where you're using it is seamless to the end user  and provides a   solid customer experience.

... There are a lot of people who can embrace different types of clouds. You've got hybrid clouds,    private clouds, public clouds, all with different offerings. For us  it   made sense to do a private cloud. For others, it may make sense to  do   hybrid type cloud.

As we move toward the future, I can see  that   we might be able to offload some of our services toward the  public   cloud. As we increase the size of some of our data and we have  patient   care cut over to the side, there might be some other data that  does not   follow the same guidelines. We can put that into a secure  public cloud   and attach everything.

I'm    not worried about theft of an individual device, because the device     has nothing more on it than some connectors to get somewhere.



VMware is coming out with those tools and using those tools to make that  kind   of continuation project possible to look at. We're very excited  about   some of the initiatives that we've seen at VMworld -- the vCloud Director,    with security, the different layers built into that that could make    some of the public cloud usable for us for specific applications.

Gardner: Correct me if I am wrong, but it sounds as if private cloud to   you means better security.

Fuss: Oh, it does, most definitely. I'm no longer worried about the  endpoint   device walking away from us. I'm not worried about theft of  an   individual device, because the device has nothing more on it than  some   connectors to get somewhere.

When we were first embracing  zero   client technology in a lot of places, we did some studies. We  talked to   some different people who had already embraced it. One  particular   hospital I spoke to said they had on video someone stealing  a zero   client device, perhaps thinking that they had stolen some  great new   utility tool for home, a new PC. They were all excited.

They  also   have them on video, bringing it back the next morning, because  they   couldn’t do anything with it when they got to their house. Using  cloud,   using the technologies that ride in the cloud, like VMware View and access to the data through VMware View, really helps to lock things down and it helps to prevent things.

No data leakage

In the past, somebody could have taken a PC, and let’s say that PC could have had metadata on it or could have had some files on it that were saved in someway.   It  was comical to hear that story from another person who was in a   similar  situation as us, where there was no data loss or data leakage,   even if  that device had never come back. So the cloud really has   tightened  things down for us.

One of the primary concerns for our electronic medical records is that it’s patient data, financial data, and so needs to be PCI-, and HIPAA-compliant.    All the different compliance standards that we need to abide by are   all  satisfied with the ways that these machines are locked down, by the   way  the cloud is moving, and where we allow it to move to.

Gardner: How do you view private cloud and VDI  -- separate, distinct,  together? What’s the relationship?

Fuss: They're definitely together. They have to be together. In my opinion,    it’s what makes sense. We want to see the data tight. We want to see   the  integration tight. We can have a cloud where the data roams back   and  forth, but the connection into the cloud actually uses that data.

As    I sit here on a device, a personal device at the office that is    connected to my virtual desktop instance, this device doesn't even have    to be on my network. I'm utilizing a public network that we have here   at  the hospital system and I've connected into my virtual desktop. I   have  full accessibility. I'll flip over here in a few minutes when I go   into  another meeting. I'll bring my iPad with me, another personal device, and I'll be connected right to that same virtual desktop.

So    the cloud has allowed me, with View, to seamlessly move between all    these different devices. I no longer am tied to something. I'm no  longer   tied to a specific physical location, a physical anything. I  really am   completely mobile. I can work anywhere at any time and have  that same   common set of tools.

I    should no longer call it disaster recovery. I should call it our     second data center because even though it really is 100 miles away, I     can still sit there and work all day long just like I'm anywhere else.



It    doesn't matter if I'm working out of the DR site. I should no longer    call it disaster recovery. I should call it our second data center    because even though it really is 100 miles away, I can still sit there    and work all day long just like I'm anywhere else. That ability is    really the value that using a cloud and using View gives you.

I    want a physician in his office, out on the road or wherever they might    be, at home, in a practice have access to that same data and have a    similar look and feel every time they connect from whatever device.    That's what these solutions that we've opted for have provided for us.

...    We can already see the expansion, the use of that technology in    different areas. We have some physicians with iPads working throughout    the facility, visiting the patient’s bedsides, looking at their charts,    all that kind of flex room is great.

I've seen it in our    administrative areas, our human resource officer using iPad remotely.    We’ve had our Chief Information Officer using an iPad, using a PC at    home, and connecting through the View client to her machine.

We’ve    gotten support not just from forcing the technology out there, but by    people asking for the technology. That’s how you can tell you have a    good product. People asking, "Can I be moved to this new product,    because the flexibility of my supervisor, director, whoever is using is    what I need."

Hit a home run

If    the director calls saying, "I need this employee to have this    flexibility," you know you've hit a home run with the technology. I    haven’t had anybody call asking for another PC at another location for    the same person to work. I have people calling saying, "I really need  to   get them onto this technology as soon as it’s possible, because  it's   made this employee so efficient. I need to do that for everybody  else."

... Also, everything that we're doing   allows us not to  focus on location, and that's the big thing. We break   away from  location. So where is the data center? Is it going to be   affected by the next hurricane coming up the East Coast? Well, if we  have a fear of where the   hurricane is, we can move our data center 100  miles inland. Or if we   think that inland is going to be more affected,  we can keep it in Rhode   Island, which is right on the ocean.

So  we have that ability,   and nobody knows where that data is other than the  IT department. We   know it's within the system, within the security, but  nobody would ever   notice the difference or question where the data is  running or   residing. They might ask, and we could tell them, but nobody  says,   "Wow, that's slow" or "I can see a difference." None of those kind  of   calls comes in as the cloud flexes.

Gardner: At  VMworld, you've had a chance to look over View 5, and the  PC-over-IP benefits there; is that something that’s in your pipeline?

Fuss: Absolutely. We’re blessed to be in the VMware 5 beta test user group,    and we’re loving what we see. We like the performance. The PC-over-IP    expansion is amazing. They’ve written a great protocol there with  their   partners, and that is the technology that’s going to continue to  drive   the reinvention of the desktop.

We’ve gone through the    reinvention of the desktop a few times in my career, from somewhat dumb    terminals to smart terminals to client server. We seem to be making  our   way back to where we’re keeping our data safe in data centers and  in   silos. We’re giving people a great end-user experience to give them  a   full PC feature-set. We’re doing it all securely and we’re doing it  all   with products that integrate seamlessly with one another, and  that’s   really the goal.

We seem to be making our way back to where we’re keeping our data safe in data centers and in silos.



We    want the user to sit down and feel comfortable with whatever   technology  they use, and to have a way to take care of our patients   that need our  help and take care of what other important administrative   business they  may do, so we can keep moving forward.

...  So   the benefits are there, and they’re just growing now, as it's    integrated and being used more in the clinical areas. We’ve seen some    growth recently. Even our pharmacy staff is starting to carry iPads    around, when they’re doing inventories of some of the medication    machines and being able to get that information right there, but on a    device that’s secure. If they were to leave it behind, nobody could    connect to anything, and that data all sitting safe inside the data    center.

So the adoption is there, the benefits are already there,    and it's just growing and growing. Every time I turn around, we’re    bumping another 50, another 75, virtual machines, into another pool of machines for a new purpose, and that’s the expansion that I keep wanting to encourage.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:
0 Comments Permalink
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

Our   next VMworld case study interview scouts out how the Tampa Bay Rays, a Major League Baseball team, is using an extensive amount of virtualization on and off the field.

The Rays' IT department has just started bringing more and more of their applications, data, and processes out to the mobile tier using virtualization and thin-client approaches to make the preferred mobile device, the tablet, super powerful for them. And they're extending the value of virtualization into disaster recovery (DR) too.

This story comes as part of a special BriefingsDirect podcast series from the recent VMworld 2011 Conference. The series explores the latest in cloud computing and virtualization infrastructure developments.

To    hear more winning statistics about the Rays and their back-end to  client virtualization experience, we're joined by Juan Ramirez, Senior  Director for Information Technology with the Tampa Bay Rays. The discussion is moderated by  Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions. [Disclosure: VMware is a sponsor of BriefingsDirect podcasts.]

Here are some excerpts:
Gardner: Why  has virtualization been good for your organization?

Ramirez: Back in 2007 when we first looked out at virtualization, we had a lot of issues. Our main   data center was located at our stadium in Saint Petersburg, Fla. We  were  actually  running out of space. Electricity was a huge problem. We  kept  hearing  from our operations department that our data centers and  our  equipment  were just consuming too much energy.

We had to come up with a new data center.    We needed to build something else, because we were just basically    outgrowing it. We needed a plan to say, "You know what, this is going to    be our new data center. We're going to be there 5 to 10 years,"   without  going back and requesting additional space or consuming more    electricity.

That's when everything started. We went from a    two-room data center room to basically just using half of that room with    virtualization. We started very small -- four hosts to manage our own infrastructure. Now we have 10 hosts in production and growing.

Another dilemma that we had was every time we needed to provision servers, or a new application needed to be introduced, it would have    taken weeks, if not a month, for us to procure the proper hardware and    software to make this available for different departments. So we  needed   to cut time on that and make things happen faster. It is a fast    business.

Gardner: To what degree have you actually embraced virtualization?

Without    VMware and the different products that we deploy, I think today  we'd    be in a lot of trouble if we wouldn’t have gone that route.



Ramirez: Currently, we're at 95 percent. We had certain goals to start --  about   50 percent -- and gradually every year just adding more and more    resources. At 95 percent, you can see that we really value this, and    this is the route that our business is going to.

Gardner: What  IT does it take to support a major league team?

Ramirez: First of all, coming from a small-market team, we don’t have the luxury  to have a large   IT department to support the 300 plus users that we  currently have. So   it’s very important for us to be very proactive and  be ahead of the   game.

It is a 24×7 operation, especially  during the season, which   as we all know, is one of the longest in  professional sports, with 162   games per year, not counting playoffs.  So it is challenging for us,  but I  believe that we have a great team.

We  also have great  resources  that we've implemented in the last five or  six years and  we're on top of  it. Without VMware and the different  products that we  deploy, I think  today we'd be in a lot of trouble if  we wouldn’t have  gone that route.

Gardner: Clearly it's working for you. Tell me about how many apps you're   supporting. What sort of workloads have you?

Ramirez: From the applications perspective, we have everything from our scanning application, which is homegrown SQL back-end, Windows application front-end, and web-based front-end to our finance departments, Great Plains, Microsoft Great Plains 2010.

We also have our customer relationship management (CRM) system, which runs on a proprietary application from Ticketmaster,    to homegrown application. Close to 10-30 applications are used on a    daily basis from every department and different aspect, which is    incredible.

Our email system, Microsoft Exchange 2010, is 100    percent virtualized. And every new application that comes up in our    pipeline is basically virtualized. Going forward, nothing resides in our    physical server, which is tremendous for us.

Products enrich the roster

When  we started, we wanted to go slow and to make sure that  everyone   throughout the organization had a good feel for it, a good  vibe. Once   we earned the trust from the different departments and other  department   heads, we introduced it, we showed them and we trained  them. It was a   no-brainer. Everyone was on board. Everyone loved the  technology.  Just  loved the fact that while it previously took weeks and  months for  them  to provision anything from our department, it's now  hours, at  the most,  which is great.

It also helps us big time  with  disaster recovery (DR). Our second  data center is located in our Port  Charlotte Spring  Training facility.  It's easier for us to move  workloads, depending on  where we're at in the  season and the time of  the year. We can move a  machine from the  production main data center  to the backup data center  and provide those  resources over to our  different departments.

When  we  started with DR, it was a  very tough decision because we wanted to do   everything automated, but  management did not see the need for it. So we   actually started with  manual processes. We started building a data   center down in Port  Charlotte. We did some migrations and that didn’t   work out too well.  So we came back to the drawing board and said, we   need a tool that can  help us automate this process. This has to be 100   percent automated.

We    came back to the drawing board and said, we need a tool that can help     us automate this process. This has to be 100 percent automated.



Our    recovery manager had just come out and we wanted to test it. We    actually beta tested it and received some evaluation licenses. We put  together   a quick product to show administration and management how  good the   product was and how important it was to us, especially in the  location   that we are at.

The rest is basically history. We  have pretty   much 100 percent coverage on everything that is  virtualized. We're able   to take periodic snaps and move them over to  the VR facility, where we   do a weekly test of each individual virtual machine (VM).

Gardner: So that must make you sleep a little better during hurricane season?

Ramirez: Absolutely. It used to be nightmare from June to the end of September around here, but not anymore.

Gardner: Let's move into this other innovative area you have been experimenting with, and it's the use VMware View 4.6. You've been involved with moving into thin   clients,  virtualized desktops, and I understand also using mobile apps   on  tablets. Tell me why that's been important for you and what you've    done.

250 remote users

Ramirez: Throughout the year, we've grown tremendously. We now have close to   250  remote users. All those remote users need to be equipped with very    expensive laptops. It's very expensive and very hard to manage.

We're    a small IT department. It's very hard to track down 250 users    throughout the year. It's very hard to keep older machines up-to-date.    When something goes wrong, it gets ugly pretty fast. We needed to get  an   alternative and come up with a plan where it would be easier to   manage,  where it would be easier for them to conduct their work.

We    started very basic by putting the in VMware View client. First of  all,   we set up a lab here and asked a few of our key guys to test and  give  us  some feedback. The feedback was overwhelming. We started with  five  or  six guys, and now we probably have close to 65 users using it  on a  daily  basis.

Users have come back and handed in their laptops. Now, they're strictly on iPad or Android tablet, which is tremendous for us. It's easier for my department to    manage. It's easier for them to go out there on the field and just use  a   lightweight device to connect and conduct business with it.

So    it's big for us right now. It should be a huge hit in the upcoming   year.  With our development department, everything that we are   projecting is  basically basing it on VMware View.

Users have come back and handed in their laptops. Now, they're strictly on iPad or Android tablet, which is tremendous for us.



Gardner: In addition to VMware View, you also seem to be using an iPad app, how  did that come about? How does that fit into the equation?

Ramirez: That came as we started adding more users and receiving feedback. I    started using it for my daily management show, introduced a few key    personnel to it, and they liked the idea. Now, everyone is basically    using that app to connect and do most of their work.

We decided    to introduce other departments and show them the capability and how  easy   it is to connect and get their business done without turning on  their   laptop -- waiting for it to boot, the VPN, the password, and all that stuff that sometimes gets in the way.

Gardner: I understand you have scouts, managers, you have lots of folks out in    the field. They're at ballparks. They're watching ballplayers.  They're   in the field, and can they just download an iPad app and then  sign into   VMware View. How do they actually connect in, and what are  the  logistics  for really linking your resources and apps out to that  field?

Everyone wants a tablet

Ramirez: Everyone in the organization wants a tablet. They come to  us,  which  helps us big time. Normally we do the procurement for them,  or if   they go out there and buy it, they will just bring it over to us,  and   by default our installation and process includes that application.  It's   the first application that they're introduced to.

My   department  is able to figure the necessary settings on the application   and just  leave it ready for them and let them know that right now you   can just  use your iPad application to connect into your resources and   conduct,  and use most of the applications that you will be using on a   daily  basis. It's a big plus for us and for the user. They just love   the fact  that they have a small application, a small tablet, and one   application  to deal with. Everything else is handled from our end.

Gardner: So this is productivity for you, because you're supporting more users    in the way that they want to work, probably with fewer resources when   it  all comes down to it, when you can consolidate. And then they're    getting that added productivity of access to the data and the apps    wherever they are, whenever they want to use it. So it's kind of a    win-win.

Ramirez: Absolutely. From a  management   perspective, it’s great, it's awesome, getting apps for a  better   application and a better system to have deployed.

We've  had   nightmares throughout the years, lost laptops with very sensitive    information. We have to protect users, and there are so many things  that   goes on on a daily basis. Now if there's an issue, it just takes    seconds to correct, and the users just go back in and continue doing    their work.

From    a management perspective, it’s great, it's awesome, getting apps  for  a   better application and a better system to have deployed.



Gardner: What’s  been the  return on investment (ROI) for you moving in these directions?

Ramirez: The ROI has been huge. We used to buy 10-15 servers on a yearly basis. Now, we just procure our servers every three or   four  years. We get hit from left and right with different departments.   They  have different needs -- we need 10 servers, we need 15 servers.  We  no  longer have to procure those and spend all that money right  away.  We  have resources allocated for it.

So the ROI has been  there.  As a  matter of fact, we did research two years ago and have  discovered  that  on our initial investment for both data centers the  return on  investment  was 24 months, which was probably more than we  thought. We  didn’t  realize how fast we were able to recoup our  investment and how  much  flexibility we had moving forward.

For  DR, we were coming  from a  situation where we had nothing. Everything  was in one data  center, and  if a storm came by, we would basically be  out of business.  Having a  fully automated system in place is huge for  us.

Very important

I
don’t even know where to start and what number to tag this with, but   it  is very important to us. It has helped with insurance cost. It has    helped with just the ease of everyone knowing that if something  happens   near our stadium, we have our data and we can still conduct  business   moving forward.

We are buying fewer laptops.    We no longer need all the extra services that with 250 laptops can  get   very costly. Instead of ordering an $1,800 laptop for a user,  which   normally lives 12-24 months, now we can just buy an iPad or have  the   users use their own iPad, and connect. That makes a big saving  for us   going forward.

We have very big plans to move  ahead and try to be 99 percent   virtualized. Private cloud is very  important. It's high for us. We keep   growing, and our needs and  demands are huge. So we definitely have a  lot  of plans.

We have very big plans to move ahead and try to be 99 percent virtualized. Private cloud is very important.



Coming down the line, we're counting big on the upcoming vSphere 5 and SRM 5. That’s going to help us tremendously. It has some features there that are must-have for us.

Again,    moving forward, application development and everything will hopefully    be based on a thin app and ease of use and administration for our   users.  VMware View is another big component for us.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes/iPod. Read a full transcript or download a copy. Sponsor: VMware.

You may also be interested in:
1 Comments Permalink
1 2 Previous Next
Dana Gardner

Dana Gardner

Member since: Jul 19, 2011

Analyst Dana Gardner examines IT news and trends that impact software strategists to provide insights and outcomes on cloud, SOA, app dev, SaaS, enterprise infrastructure and mobile convergence.

View Dana Gardner's profile

Actions

Create Your Own Personal Blog

To create a personal blog on VMworld.com, sign into your account, click on "Manage Account" in the top right corner of any page, click on the "Blog Posts" tab and then click on "Create a Personal Blog" or "Write a Blog Post" from within your account profile.

Note: All blogs will be monitored and reviewed for content. Any blogs not related to virtualization or considered to be spam or offensive will be removed.